PPP - Fri, 27 September 2013
May Titthara
The government’s latest five-year strategy calls for a
complete halt to economic land concessions (ELCs) and an inquiry into those
still in the pipeline.
But the plan has drawn scepticism from conservationists and
rights groups, who pointed out that loopholes have been liberally applied after
the issuance of similar moratoriums in the past.
In the directive, issued on Wednesday as part of the
five-year plan governing the next mandate, the government vows to strengthen how
ELCs are awarded and regulated in order to “eliminate of all kinds of illegal
rampant land grabs, prevent the collection of land without use … [and] resolve
land disputes with justice and transparency”.
Similarly, it promises to improve crackdowns on forest
crimes and put a renewed focus on the protection of forestry resources.
But many said yesterday that they doubted that the
announcement – though promising on paper – would entail any true reform.
“I absolutely don’t believe it, because previously, [Prime
MInister Hun Sen] promised to cut his head off if he couldn’t prevent forestry
destruction. But, today, he still has his head and continues to offer economic
land concessions that affect people throughout the country,” said Kuch Veng, a
community activist from Pursat who was sentenced in 2012 to more than three
months in prison after staging a series of strikes against powerful developer
Pheapimex.
In May 2012, Hun Sen issued a complete moratorium on ELCs,
saying the human cost had become far too high. But the directive allowed those
already approved but not yet begun to move forward – even while refusing to say
how many were in the pipeline.
The failures of that ban, said Licadho director Naly
Pilorge, gave little hope for the newest directive.
“It will take more than words to be optimistic on the actual
chances of seeing promise becoming reality for thousands of affected families,”
she said.
Last year, more than 380,000 hectares of land was granted as
ELCs or reclassified from state public to private land (a frequent first step
toward an ELC grant). The vast majority of it – 71.5 per cent – was pulled from
forests and wildlife sanctuaries that are meant to be protected under the law.
Conservationist Marcus Hardtke pointed to the willingness of
government officials to flout the laws when it came to the granting of
concessions as a reason for suspicion over the latest ban.
“Most of these concessions are already illegal under
Cambodian law.… There is basically a giant timber and land grab going on. If
the government wants to be serious at all, there needs to be a complete
moratorium on these existing concessions. Short of that, we will not see any
improvements,” he said.
While cutting down on ELCs, the government strategy,
meanwhile, talks about upping the number of social land concessions.
Ostensibly aimed at providing land to the nation’s poorest,
they, too, have proven easily abused in recent years. In a report issued by
Adhoc earlier this year, researchers found that 13 of 38 SLCs granted in the
past year had led to conflicts.
Barring a thorough review of existing concessions, Adhoc
senior investigator Chan Soveth said, it was unlikely new bans would improve
the situation.
“The government must review the companies receiving ELCs and
explain how action will be taken when they deviate from the contract,” he said.
Over the past years, however, few – if any – have been
punished for incursions and land grabbing, even as lawsuits among villagers who
fight back stack up.
With little enforcement of existing laws, there could be
scant hope that any directive would be followed, pointed out opposition party
whip Son Chhay.
“If they want to prevent illegal ELCs they need a mechanism
that arrests bad officials and punishes them [for continuing to grant them],”
he said. “Giving ELCs for 99 years never gives any benefits; it just destroys
the nation.”
2 comments:
My analysis scenario
Sam rainsy the blackmailer vs Hun Sen the former soldier Khmer rouge
*The current stand-off between MM Sam Rainsy and Hun Sen would be: a
"HUGE FINANCIAL MATTER".
* I bet that everything will sort out in the near future, and Mr Sam Rainsy will take up position as the President of the National Assembly of Cambodia to legalise Hun Sen government. * Sooner or later, Mr Sam Rainsy will be stripped of his parliamentary immunity and will flee in self-imposed exile as he get used to it.
* Finally, he would have a luxurious retirement surrounded by young and beautiful girls.
It would be a happy ending for him.
Preah Bat Theurmeuk predictions.
WHY HASN'T SAM RAINSY DONE ANYTHING UNTIL NOW TO CONFRONT HUN SEN, INSTEAD KEEP ON WASTING TIME PRAYING AND WAITING FOR THE PRESIDENT OF MP OFFICE.
HOWEVER HE HASN'T EVEN CALLED TO MOBILISE TO HELP PEOPLE VICTIM OF FLOOD, LEAVING ONLY CPP DO IT. HAS HE NOT DONE FOR A PURPOSE? TO HELP HUN SEN REGAIN POPULARITY,?TO GET BEST DEAL? THE PRESENT SAM RAINSY ALSO HAS IGNORED THE KILLING OF ACTIVIST SAN SOEUN, OR THE STUDENT PANHA, CHAN, OR HASN'T CONDEMNED THE BRUTALITY OF POLICE TOWARDS PEACEFUL PROTESTORS, INSTEAD HE AND CNRP BLAMED PEACEFUL PROTESTORS. ISNT-IT STRANGE FOR A LEADER OF OPPOSITION? I'VE BEEN HIS FOLLOWER SINCE HE BECAME POLITICIAN. I NOTICE THE PRESENT SAM RAINSY IS NOT THE SAME AS HE WAS. HE COMPLETELY DON'T CARE FOR PEOPLE SUFFERING ANYMORE.
I CAN SEE BEFORE GRENADE ATTACK, SAM RAINSY WAS VERY ACTIVE, WENT EVERYWHERE TO HELP FLOOD VICTIM PEOPLE,
OVER THE LAST FEW DAYS HE STARTS TO CARE FOR HIS OWN IMAGE, MAYBE ATFTER SERIOUS CRITICS, DOUBTS ON HIS PATRIOTISM, BUT UNLUCKILY, HE STILL NOT IGNORES THE VICTIM OF THE FLOOD.
KHMER PEOPLE MUST KEEP AN EYE ON THIS MAN FROM NOW.
SAM RAINSY CHANGE WE CAN'T BELIEVE IN ANYMORE. KHMERS SHOULD FIND ANOTHER ONE OUTSIDE THE CNRP TO REPLACE HIM BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE.
Post a Comment