August 1, 2013 |
Strat For Global Intelligence
Summary
(TANG
CHHIN SOTHY/AFP/Getty Images)
Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen at a construction site in Phnom Penh
on July 31
The party that has ruled Cambodia since 1985 is facing the biggest
challenge to its authority in years. Prime Minister Hun Sen said July
31 that his Cambodia People's Party is ready to talk with the
opposition Cambodia National Rescue Party after the opposition and
international observers accused it of vote rigging and fraud in the
July 28 parliamentary elections, which the ruling party claimed it had
won. The opposition has pledged to have its supporters launch street
demonstrations and has called for a U.N. investigation. The looming
political instability could undermine Cambodia's prospects as one of
East Asia's most promising emerging economies.
Analysis
The offer to begin talks came a day after the opposition party declared
itself the victor in the elections, saying it had won 63 of the
parliament's 123 seats. For its part, the Cambodia People's Party said
that it had won 68 seats to the opposition's 55. Either way, the
results represent an erosion of the ruling party's former majority and
a massive gain for the Cambodia National Rescue Party, which had won
only 26 seats in the 2008 elections. If the opposition won as many
seats as it has claimed, it would have the largest bloc of votes in the
parliament, though still not the two-thirds necessary to form the next
government.
The opposition's rejection of the election results and refusal to
participate in the parliament with the ruling party has raised the
prospects of political instability in the country. The offer to engage
the opposition in talks itself is an admission by Hun Sen -- who has
ruled the country in a authoritarian manner for decades -- that his
party's political dominance has already weakened, and could be a sign
that he would rather entertain concessions to the opposition than form
a government without the opposition at the expense of losing legitimacy
in the eyes of the public.
The current situation is reminiscent of the political and social
instability surrounding
general
elections in July 1998, when the Cambodia National Rescue Party's
predecessor, along with other opposition parties, demanded a recount of
election results that declared victory -- albeit slim -- for Hun Sen's
party. Large-scale street demonstrations were organized, and the
opposition requested intervention by external forces. To quell the
political unrest, Hun Sen was forced to neutralize the opposition
through a combination of political concessions, a security crackdown
and threats against opposition members.
Renewed Interest
However, in 1998 Asia was a different place. The region was still
struggling with economic crises and underdevelopment, China was only
beginning to look toward projecting power externally and Indonesia was
in the midst of political chaos after Suharto's fall just two months
before Cambodia's elections. This was compounded by the United States'
relative lack of involvement in the Asia-Pacific region after the end
of the Cold War. In this context, Cambodia was deemed relatively
unimportant, with comparatively little external pressure on Hun Sen's
authoritarian regime.
Nonetheless, in recent years Cambodia has re-emerged as a
key regional player and is seeing
renewed external interest in the country. The Cambodian opposition
is looking to capture some of this growing external attention and
direct it to the country's domestic political scene. It hopes to
challenge the ruling party's decades-long dominance amid the
allegations of election fraud and bolster its own political prominence.
As part of this new wave of attention, the West -- particularly the
United States -- has attempted to court Cambodia's leaders with
additional financial aid and support, which the country needs to
diversify investment and develop its economy. This effort, however, has
not been entirely successful, since China has well established
political and economic ties to Cambodia, and Cambodia has depended on
China to deter the influence of its occasionally hostile neighbors --
Vietnam and Thailand.
Leading up to the elections, Washington pressured the ruling party by
threatening to cut off assistance if elections were not deemed free and
fair and later called for an investigation into the fraud allegations.
Still, despite the opposition's strong showing in the 2013 elections,
outside players are not likely to completely forsake their
relationships with the ruling party in favor of the opposition.
At the same time, opposition parties have demonstrated an ability to
use their more populist socio-economic political platform to win votes
from the ruling party, the legitimacy of which rests on political
stability and years of strong economic growth in the post-Khmer Rouge
era. In particular, the Cambodia National Rescue Party has capitalized
on discontent among the public over rising inequality, corruption and
land-seizures. The party is attempting to appeal to the youth by
promising an increase in the minimum wage and to the elderly with a
monthly pension, alongside long-standing promises to tackle corruption.
The Cambodia National Rescue Party has also promoted Cambodian
nationalism by appealing to the widespread aversion of Vietnam, which
occupied the country from the late 1970s until 1993.
The Cambodia People's Party is still widely popular in the countryside.
However, the opposition's strong performance in the latest election
demonstrated that it is capable of challenging the ruling party's
primacy. Even though the country is now being courted as an emerging
economy, the potential for political instability could jeopardize its
prospects.
1 comment:
One of the reasons that CPP got 90 seats from 2008 was based on fraudulent election. Manipulated, stole, bought, threatening, and so on and plus people were feared of rising against the ironic ruler. But the 2013 election the CPP party did not foresaw that people would become as observers and participated in stopping fraudulence, though they were not able to stop completely. The CPP party managed to steal, manipulate, buy, and erase names from the lists, but some of these methods were not fully successful that how the CPP's number came down. The CPP popularity has been low all the previous elections, but the voters did not participate in stopping the irregularities.
Post a Comment