May 1, 2012
An article by Dr. Gaffar Peang-Meth published by the Asian Human Rights Commission
I wrote in my last article in this space of the accumulating
circumstances that compel a change in the current leadership of
Cambodia. In Cambodia, the rich are getting richer while one-third of
the population lives on less than US$0.61 per day. Many survive on what
they scavenge from garbage dumps only blocks from the lavish homes of
the wealthy. Those who live in rural areas, too, are losing economic
ground, and most are impoverished.
Considering Cambodia's estimated annual population growth rate of 1.7
percent (compared with France, 0.5 percent or England, 0.2 percent) and
the slow increase of Cambodia's GDP per capita, it would seem that
Cambodians will continue to struggle against a tide of poverty for the
foreseeable future.
Odom, an unemployed university graduate in Cambodia, armed with World
Bank statistics on Gross National Income per capita between 2007 and
2010, reminds me that Cambodia remains the poorest country among its
neighbors: a Lao is on average richer than a Cambodian by a ratio of
1.24 to 1, a Malay, 10.51 to 1, and a Singaporean, 53.03 to 1; in 2010, a
Thai had an income 1.4 time higher than the incomes of a Vietnamese, a
Lao and a Cambodian combined.
Martin Hutchinson's "Cambodia must solve two big problems for takeoff" (Reuters) asserts that "Feeding, educating and housing ever
more Cambodians will be a challenge," but zeroes in on "Corruption as
the real enemy" and cites Transparency International's Corruption Index
ranking of Cambodia as among "the worst global slums."
Greek philosopher Aristotle (384 BC-322 BC), a founder of Western civilization, warns in Politics,
"The passion for equality is at the root of revolution." An established
general theory links inequality and violent rebellion. Students of
conflict argue that economic inequality is a major cause of dissent, and
that poverty and deprivation lead the disadvantaged person to revolt.
Land concessions
I have written here and elsewhere about Cambodia's current land
concession policies that lead to land conflicts, mass evictions of
people from their homes and land, violations of individual and property
rights, among other issues. After all is said, I argue for change of the
present status quo.
Last week, I watched a video titled, "Illegal logging by Cambodia:
What the (Prime Minister Hun Sen) says and what the PM does", posted on
the website of opposition leader Mu Sochua. The logging video is
informative and includes a professionally presented film embedded in the
video, "The Green Deal in Cambodia," in English and with subtitles. Ms.
Sochua wrote on her website: "For land and forests in Cambodia, we
demand accountability of the head of the government."
Anarchic logging
The video opens with a collage of news clippings on the massive
logging operations, followed by dramatic night scenes of trucks with
headlights carrying huge logs. In the background one hears Premier Hun
Sen giving an address in Khmer with appropriate English subtitles--Khmer
language being more vulgar than the English subtitles, I must add. The
audio clips are eventually succeeded by videoed segments of the premier
delivering this speech.
The video is undated, as is the embedded film with English narration.
What the posting makes clear, however, is that the deforestation of
Cambodia has been under way for decades, documented by the World Bank
and other agencies, and has continued at an accelerated pace during the
regime of Hun Sen. It is under the current regime, in fact, that the
denuding of Cambodia’s forests has not only increased, but has been done
for no purpose other than to enrich members of the ruling party.
Aware, perhaps, of the emotional impact of thousands of acres of tree
stumps, Hun Sen is heard in the video on Mu Sochua's website to decry
the very destruction he has sanctioned: "I admit the biggest mistake of
my life was management of the forests … from '93 to '98. It was a big
mistake," he declares. "From '79 to '93, I wasn't responsible because I
didn't let people log," he said, "But from ’93 to ’98 it was
incredible," and the video shows more night scenes of trucks carrying
huge felled trees. "Consider that forestry is the life of this
government" he said, and, "I'm not asking for a lot. Let's protect the
forests that we still have."
Juxtaposed with Hun Sen's hypocritical remarks is the film "The Green
Deal in Cambodia," narrated in English: "Cambodia is one of the most
forested countries in Southeast Asia," but the forests "disappeared at
an alarming rate" in the last three decades.
According to the narration, under Pol Pot's regime forests were
cleared to increase farm acreage (1975-79), but the film report claims
that during the 1990s, the forested lands that had survived the Khmer
Rouge clear-cutting" were given as logging concessions to Cambodian and
foreign companies many of which enjoyed close ties with senior
officials." The report alleges the Royal Cambodian Armed Forces are
heavily involved in anarchic logging and provide protection and labor
for logging operations.
"Corruption and the absence of law enforcement ensured that the
profits from the logging benefited only a powerful elite," says the
narrator, as "most taxes due on the timber from concessions were not
paid and the logging contributed nothing to Cambodia’s development."
The video cites a 1998 World Bank report finding that Cambodia’s
forest cover had been reduced by 30 percent in the previous 30 years,
and if logging continued at this same rate the country’s forest reserves
would be exhausted by 2003 (sic). The video also cites a 1999 Asian
Development Bank report describing Cambodia’s forest management as a
total system failure.
Three years after the World Bank report, the video says, the
government announced a ban on all logging concession activities
effective January 1, 2002.
The video then returns to Hun Sen's speech (undated): "If the logging
companies still don't listen, take away their licenses." He said he
read in The Cambodia Daily that morning that, "many companies won't
(don't) obey the order of the Ministry of Agriculture. "Just you try,"
he shouted, "If you aren't going to obey, just you try."
"If I don't take way your concession and shut down your factory, I
will cut off my head (and throw it away)," he announced dramatically.
Cold-blooded murder
Cambodians have vehemently protested the loss of the country's
forests. Memorable protests have occurred in recent months such as the
Prey Lang protest. In the forefront of this protest movement, Cambodian
Green activist Chut Wutty has been an outspoken leader. In fact, I
quoted Wutty in my March 15 article for the AHRC, when he spoke of the
leasing to a Chinese firm of land in Cambodia's Botum Sakor national
park in Koh Kong province. Wutty said, "You think after 99 years this
land will be returned to Cambodia? You think they will kick the Chinese
out? No way. It's forever." On April 25th, while escorting reporters to
another site in Koh Kong undergoing deforestation, Wutty was fatally
shot by military police charged with guarding the site from those who
might interfere with the work of the lessees.
Speaking earlier of Wutty, Ou Virak, the president of the Cambodian
Center for Human Rights said that Wutty, subject of many threats because
of his advocacy, had told one of Virak's colleagues that he would
likely end up "in jail or he'll be shot. He understands the risk and
he's aware of the risk, and still chose to continue to do the work" (of
protecting Cambodia's forests).
According to news reports, on April 25, Chut Wutty, 43, father of two, director of Cambodia's environmental watchdog Natural Resource Protection Group in Phnom Penh, was fatally shot as he took two female journalists from The Cambodia Daily, Khmer Phorn Bopha and Ukrainian-born Canadian Olesia Plokhii, to see large-scale forest destruction and illegal rosewood smuggling near a Chinese-built hydroelectric dam in Koh Kong in Cambodia's southwest. The two reporters were detained by the military for questioning, and later released.
According to news reports, on April 25, Chut Wutty, 43, father of two, director of Cambodia's environmental watchdog Natural Resource Protection Group in Phnom Penh, was fatally shot as he took two female journalists from The Cambodia Daily, Khmer Phorn Bopha and Ukrainian-born Canadian Olesia Plokhii, to see large-scale forest destruction and illegal rosewood smuggling near a Chinese-built hydroelectric dam in Koh Kong in Cambodia's southwest. The two reporters were detained by the military for questioning, and later released.
According to news reports, a confrontation between Wutty and the
Cambodian military police occurred when Wutty declined to surrender a
memory card of photos of illegal logging, taken in the protected forest.
Military spokesman Colonel Kheng Tito said Wutty was armed, and refused
to stop as ordered by police officer In Ratana; that the two were
cursing one another, and that In Ratana shot Wutty with his AK-47 rifle.
The government of Hun Sen initially announced it would investigate
the shooting. On April 27, the Associated Press reported the military
closed its investigation. The military's spokesman said in the April
27th announcement that a pistol with nine bullets was found inside
Wutty's vehicle but Wutty never shot the pistol, and there never was any
exchange of fire. Colonel Kheng Tito said when MP In Ratana learned
that Wutty had died, Ratana then killed himself with his own weapon --
case closed.
Cambodia's Center for Cambodian Civic Education called the shooting
death of Wutty cold-blooded murder. Global Witness's statement calls
Wutty one of the few remaining Cambodian activists willing to speak out
against the rapid escalation of illegal logging and land grabbing which
is impoverishing ordinary Cambodians and destroying the country's rich
natural heritage.
Standing Tall with the People
On the day I watched the video on "anarchic logging," I also watched
opposition leader Sochua speak in an interview, titled "Standing Tall
with the People." I have never met Sochua. Her statements, however,
reminded me of events of June 2, 2010, referenced in my own article in
AHRC of June 15, 2010.
On that day Premier Hun Sen's Supreme Court upheld the lower court's
ruling against legislator Mu Sochua, who had sued Premier Sen for
defamation for 500 riels (about 12 cents). On that same day in a meeting
of Cambodian officials, non-governmental groups (minus the London-based
Global Witness) and international aid donors, it was agreed to award
Cambodia US$1.1 billion in development aid.
This award occurred despite the release of a report by 15
non-governmental organizations, "Cambodia Silenced: The End Days of
Democracy?" calling on the international donor community to "take
serious note of the deterioration of freedom of expression in Cambodia."
The paper states: "For over a decade the international community has
provided aid to Cambodia but most have remained largely quiet as human
rights have been violated and democratic space eroded."
I wrote about lessons drawn from these events: In the world of
realpolitik, national interest -- what actually brings more immediate
benefit to serving a country's foreign policy goal -- trumps the elusive
rights and freedoms of individuals; toothless international resolutions
condemning injustices may be better than nothing, but they are not the
"sticks and stones" that break bones and save such human rights leaders
as Sochua and others.
As I watched "Standing Tall with the People," I heard Sochua's words
on the fundamental problems between donor countries and Cambodian
democrats, and I am reminded of Albert Einstein's "The world is a
dangerous place. Not because of the people who are evil; but because of
the people who don't do anything about it."
Sochua said in the video that she knew exactly with whom she was
dealing when she took Premier Hun Sen to court. "This is not a court of
justice but of injustice," she said. She does not object to the
international community's 'stay engaged' policy, but to 'stay complicit'
with a regime that does harms to the people is morally wrong. She went
on to say, "It's morally wrong to keep it in power."
I have a profound respect for one who will not surrender principles and justice.
……………..
The AHRC is not responsible for the views shared in this article, which do not necessarily reflect its own.
About the Author:
Dr. Gaffar Peang-Meth is retired from the University of Guam, where he taught political science for 13 years. He currently lives in the United States. He can be contacted at peangmeth@gmail.com.
Dr. Gaffar Peang-Meth is retired from the University of Guam, where he taught political science for 13 years. He currently lives in the United States. He can be contacted at peangmeth@gmail.com.
8 comments:
Certainly it is a well-written article by Dr. Peang-Meth.
Thank you, Dr. Peang-Meth.
The international communities should be ashamed of themselves for having failed many times to do anything concrete or right to help poor people in the oppressed countries.
Just look at the KR Killing Fields and Rwanda genocide and one can see the hypocrisy of the powerful and self-interest protecting so-called International Communitites.
They, including the UN,l should be ashamed of themselves for failure after failure to come to the rescue of the oppressed in our modern world.
They usually talk big and congratulate themselves on their plans to do this and to do that to help bring about justice and democracy in the oppressed world, but in the end they did little to help! It is just talk! Hun Sen gets rewarded for being bad again and again!
They heard from and read the news about the refugees who ran away from the Killing Fields in Cambodia under the KR and the genocide in Rwanda, but they did not do anything to stop it.
Commen sense dictates that when you kill your own people, then there is no such a thing as respecting your country's integrity or violation of your border.
Wake up the International Communities and shame on you for continous failure in modern time to stop genocide, oppression and injustice.
Pissed off
Certainly it is a well-written article by Dr. Peang-Meth.
Thank you, Dr. Peang-Meth.
The international communities should be ashamed of themselves for having failed many times to do anything concrete or right to help poor people in the oppressed countries.
Just look at the KR Killing Fields and Rwanda genocide and one can see the hypocrisy of the powerful and self-interest protecting so-called International Communitites.
They, including the UN,l should be ashamed of themselves for failure after failure to come to the rescue of the oppressed in our modern world.
They usually talk big and congratulate themselves on their plans to do this and to do that to help bring about justice and democracy in the oppressed world, but in the end they did little to help! It is just talk! Hun Sen gets rewarded for being bad again and again!
They heard from and read the news about the refugees who ran away from the Killing Fields in Cambodia under the KR and the genocide in Rwanda, but they did not do anything to stop it.
Commen sense dictates that when you kill your own people, then there is no such a thing as respecting your country's integrity or violation of your border.
Wake up the International Communities and shame on you for continous failure in modern time to stop genocide, oppression and injustice.
Pissed off
Place no hope and confident in mankind. better trust in the lord will all your heart. This can be reversed to: put no hope and confident on international communities. Trust not one of them. Better do something and live, or die hard.!!!!!!fucking international community asshole...they're nothing but a group of same bastards who pretend to care for justices and freedom...
I agree with everyone here. International communities are the biggest leechers in the Khmer society. This goes to many NGOs.
I have personal witness many NGOs from Malaysia, Phillipine, US, France, who claim to be devoted to helping out the country, but in facts, own properties, living on the fund for the people and gets mroe fund working with the corrupted Hun Sen and his associates.
Free travel expenses, and holidays trips every months to Thailand and Phuket!
Foreigners have no sense of moral or oblications, instead of prosecuting Hun Sen and his lady Piggy of stealing funds, they all share the FEAST!
I worked for NGOs, and i used to have strong conviction on them....esp the white asses who claim to come and help restore our nation... i can't hold the tears for i have seen one simple yet inconvenient truth in the concepts of NGOs after have long been working and exposing my self to this...and i have no words to describe...THEY ARE ALL ASSHOLE!!!!!!!!
Did I already posted soemthing as hun sen are slaving out our people to foreign leeches.
All that charity money goes too their luxury is digusting.
Our people are suffering while hun sen and his dogs enjoy the boom, and foriegn donors are paying him instead of protesting against him.
Fuck foriegners
DCPP GUY
Wow....! What can I say....? Leeches everywhere,empire like hunclans kill khmers not only hunclans foreigners stay behind the vails makes khmers kill khmers.
Cpp Yuon +chin thugs all kill khmers with Cpp Huncent protection,they run mafia gangster to eliminate Khmer one by one...what can we do to stop this culprits.
Y.k pro
FIGHT BACK !!!
Kill or be killed
Post a Comment