Published: December 26, 2012
As
a child, Prince Ravivaddhana Sisowath went into exile in Europe with
much of the Cambodian royal family when the Khmer Rouge assumed power in
the early 1970s. He returned to Cambodia for the first time in 2000.
Today he devotes his energy to advancing the appreciation and protection
of Cambodian culture. Noah Charney spoke with the prince in Rome.
What is the path that looted Cambodian art typically travels?
The first market for stolen art is either Saigon or Bangkok, and after that it goes to London, New York, or elsewhere.
It appears that the majority of looters are Cambodians who sell the art abroad.
Yes, but I would be very tolerant about the Cambodian people. The
preservation of ancient things is not a part of our traditional
culture.
The average Cambodian would rationalize that if our ancestors
made these things, arts and crafts, and gave them to us, it was to
ensure our livelihood. Since the restoration of the monarchy in 1993 and
with the efforts of UNESCO, especially since December 1995, when Angkor
was registered as a World Heritage site, we’ve promoted the concept of
cultural patrimony. After that, a deeper consciousness developed among
the people of Cambodia, who began to take pride in their antiquities.
How would you advise
a collector or museum that wishes to acquire Cambodian art legitimately? I
always say that it is best to go to Cambodia. Go to the National
Museum, in Phnom Penh, and the Ministry of Culture. Meet with the
leading experts to learn where to
look and what to look for. In Paris,
you’ve got the Musée Guimet and its president, Olivier de Bernon, who is
one of the leading specialists in the ancient art of Cambodia.
Beginning in the 1960s Cambodia established institutions in which
artists are trained in traditional techniques to make fine copies of
ancient sculptures. I tell my friends to buy them. I would like artists
to go further, to create new things that will go into contemporary art
galleries. For such objects, you can visit the website of Les Artisans
d’Angkor.
In June you addressed the Association for Research into
Crimes Against Art about the case of a 10th-century Khmer figure
withdrawn from a sale at Sotheby’s New York in 2011
following charges that the sculpture had been looted from the temple at
Koh Ker. Do you see progress in the protection of Cambodia’s cultural
heritage?
I’m naturally optimistic, but I’m not completely unrealistic —
I’d like to raise the national consciousness about preserving
patrimony. But the people are still very poor, and having all these
objects available is a temptation. I hope for a cleaner market and
greater morality, especially on
the part of people who are buying these
objects.
Cambodia is seeking to recover a pair of statues from the Metropolitan Museum of Art. What is the story behind this request?
If I remember well, those statues were acquired legally — the
trade was made through the last U.S. ambassador in Saigon in 1975.
Still, the return would show the goodwill of the U.S. But do
you want to
know my personal opinion? I would be happy for the statues to stay in
the Met. Remember, I came through that very hard period during which we
Cambodians were convinced that our culture was going to die. In Paris we
were glad to see our art in the Musée Guimet. Whatever American museums
have of Cambodian art, I believe they should keep. This gives good
visibility to Cambodia for foreigners and for second- and
third-generation Cambodians who live abroad. It is a way for the world
to see the glories of Cambodia.
What message would you like to send to lovers and collectors of Cambodian art?
First of all, go on loving Cambodian art. It should be seen more
broadly and appreciated more widely. Beyond that, I would say please be
careful not to hurt the culture. But as far as I’m concerned, I’m very
happy to see some masterpieces of Cambodian art in foreign museums. It’s
part of the world’s patrimony.
3 comments:
I disagree with dude,khners'art should stay on khmers' soil not in the foreigner's museum.Its a crime to buy stolen art works (antique) from any where then resale to the high bidders it wrong and it is stealing,the buyer as qiulty as the looters/sellers....
Yobal Khmer
Think the former King was not able to say or to give that kind of stupid and idiot answer like these uneducated Prince.
Why he did not say, Thailand could have Prasat Preah Vihear, because Thailand nowadays is more develop than our country Cambodia and Thailand can show the world all these valuable Khmer Art Work of our ancestors to the western tourist.
It's nice to hear a member of the royal family coming out and trying to preserve Khmer art. We need more educated royals like this one.
Post a Comment