A Change of Guard

សូមស្តាប់វិទ្យុសង្គ្រោះជាតិ Please read more Khmer news and listen to CNRP Radio at National Rescue Party. សូមស្តាប់វីទ្យុខ្មែរប៉ុស្តិ៍/Khmer Post Radio.
Follow Khmerization on Facebook/តាមដានខ្មែរូបនីយកម្មតាម Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/khmerization.khmerican

Thursday 7 July 2011

Hun Sen promised to give up power peacefully


By Khmerization
Source: RFA

Speaking on 6th July, the 14th anniversary of the bloody coup, Prime Minister Hun Sen said that he will give up power peacefully if his Cambodian People's Party loses the election to be held on 28th July 2013 after the opposition Sam Rainsy Party (SRP) had called on him to follow the example of the Thai leadership where the loser gracefully accepted the election result and leaves office peacefully.

Mr. Hun sen had sarcastically assured the SRP that he will step down without any qualm. "And if I lose, I will announce to recognise the election result and push for the parliament to urgently form the new government and I will transfer my position as the prime minister and is also ready to transfer all positions from all the ministries (to the winner)", he said.

Mr. Son Chhay, a senior MP from the SRP, said he wanted to see a free and fair election in Cambodia like in Thailand. "And we want the election in Cambodia to be organised orderly, at least with the same standard like in Thailand. Not only that the SRP has internal problems, but the Cambodian People's Party (CPP) also used to have serious internal problems many, many times already", he said.

Mr. Hun Sen lost the 1993 UNTAC-organised election and refused to step down and instead threatened to secede until Funcinpec Party, the winner, agreed to a coalition deal with him. On 5-6th July 1997, Hun Sen staged a bloody coup to take power from Funcinpec, toppled Prince Ranariddh and appointed himself as the prime minister.

In the past, Mr. Hun Sen, who had turned 59 this year, had publicly declared that he will be prime minister for life or till he is 90 years old.

Please read the article in Khmer below:
----------------------------
លោក ហ៊ុន សែន សន្យា​ចុះ​ចេញ​ពី​តំណែង​ដោយ​សន្តិវិធី
ដោយ សុខ សេរី
2011-07-06

លោក​នាយករដ្ឋមន្ត្រី ហ៊ុន សែន នៅ​ថ្ងៃ​៦ កក្កដា ឆ្នាំ​២០១១ បាន​ប្រកាស​ថា លោក​នឹង​លាលែង​ពី​តំណែង​ជា​នាយករដ្ឋមន្ត្រី​ដោយ​សន្តិវិធី បើ​សិន​ណា​គណបក្ស​ប្រជាជន​កម្ពុជា ចាញ់​នៅ​ក្នុង​ការ​បោះ​ឆ្នោត​សាកល​នៅ​ថ្ងៃ​២៨ ខែ​កក្កដា ឆ្នាំ​២០១៣ ខាង​មុខ នៅ​គ្រា​មាន​ការ​រិះគន់​ថ្មីៗ​នេះ​ពី​គណបក្ស​ប្រឆាំង សម រង្ស៊ី ឲ្យ​យក​គំរូ​តាម​ការ​បោះ​ឆ្នោត​នៅ​ប្រទេស​ថៃ កន្លង​មក។

RFA/Sok Serey

០៦-កក្កដា-២០១១៖ លោក​នាយករដ្ឋមន្ត្រី ហ៊ុន សែន ថ្លែង​ក្នុង​ពិធី​បើក​ការដ្ឋាន​សាងសង់​ស្ពាន​នៅ​ក្រុង​តាខ្មៅ ខេត្ត​កណ្ដាល។

លោក​បាន​ប្រកាស​ដូច្នេះ​នៅ​ក្នុង​ពិធី​បើក​ការដ្ឋាន​សាងសង់​ស្ពាន​ក្រោម​ជំនួយ​របស់​ប្រទេស​ចិន នៅ​ក្រុង​តាខ្មៅ ខេត្ត​កណ្ដាល នៅ​ថ្ងៃ​ទី​៦ ខែ​កក្កដា ឆ្នាំ​២០១១។

លោក​នាយករដ្ឋមន្ត្រី ហ៊ុន សែន បាន​មាន​ប្រសាសន៍​ថា គណបក្ស​ប្រឆាំង​នៅ​កម្ពុជា បាន​ជូនពរ​គណបក្ស​ភឿថៃ ប៉ុន្តែ​គណបក្ស​ប្រឆាំង​នោះ​បាន​ឆ្លៀត​ឱកាស​ដាក់​ផ្លែ​ដាក់​ផ្កា​មក​លើ​រូប​លោក។

លោក ហ៊ុន សែន បាន​មាន​ប្រសាសន៍​ទៀត​ថា ផ្ទៃក្នុង​របស់​បក្ស​ប្រឆាំង សម រង្ស៊ី កំពុង​តែ​បែកបាក់​យ៉ាង​ធ្ងន់ធ្ងរ​នៅ​ពេល​នេះ ៖ «ហើយ​បើ​ថា ខ្ញុំ​ចាញ់ គឺ​ខ្ញុំ​នឹង​ប្រកាស​ទទួល​ស្គាល់​លទ្ធផល​បោះ​ឆ្នោត ហើយ​ជំរុញ​ឲ្យ​ប្រជុំ​សភា​ឲ្យ​បាន​ឆាប់ បង្កើត​រដ្ឋាភិបាល​ឲ្យ​បាន​ឆាប់ ហើយ​ខ្ញុំ​នឹង​ផ្ទេរ​តំណែង​ឲ្យ រដ្ឋមន្ត្រី​ទាំង​អស់​ត្រៀម​រៀបចំ​ខ្លួន​ចាំ​ផ្ទេរ​តំណែង​តាម​ក្រសួង»។

តំណាងរាស្ត្រ​គណបក្ស​ប្រឆាំង សម រង្ស៊ី គឺលោក សុន ឆ័យ បាន​មាន​ប្រសាសន៍​បំភ្លឺ​វិញ​ថា លោក​ចង់​ឃើញ​ការ​បោះ​ឆ្នោត​នៅ​ប្រទេស​កម្ពុជា នៅ​ឆ្នាំ​២០១៣ ប្រកប​ដោយ​សេរី និង​យុត្តិធម៌​ដូច​នៅ​ប្រទេស​ថៃ​ដែរ។

លោក សុន ឆ័យ បាន​ទទួល​ស្គាល់​ថា មាន​បញ្ហា​ផ្ទៃ​ក្នុង​របស់​គណបក្ស សម រង្ស៊ី ៖ «ហើយ​យើង​សុំ​ឲ្យ​មាន​ការ​បោះឆ្នោត​នៅ​ប្រទេស​កម្ពុជា មាន​របៀប​រៀបរយ យ៉ាង​ហោច​ណាស់​ក៏​ឲ្យ​បាន​ដូច​នៅ​ប្រទេស​ថៃ។ ថា មាន​បញ្ហា​ផ្ទៃក្នុង មិន​មែន​តែ​ចំពោះ​គណបក្ស សម រង្ស៊ី នោះ​ទេ គណបក្ស​ប្រជាជន​ក៏​ធ្លាប់​មាន​ព័ត៌មាន​អំពី​ជម្លោះ​ផ្ទៃក្នុង​ញឹកញាប់​ធ្ងន់ធ្ងរ​ច្រើន​ដង​ហើយ»។

សេចក្ដី​ថ្លែងការណ៍​របស់​គណបក្ស សម រង្ស៊ី នៅ​ថ្ងៃ​ទី​៤ ខែ​កក្កដា ឆ្នាំ​២០១១ ថ្មីៗ​នេះ បាន​លើក​ឡើង​ចំនួន ៥​ចំណុច​ដូច​ត​ទៅ៖ ទី​១ ប្រជាជន​ថៃ ក៏​ដូច​កម្ពុជា​ដែរ ចង់​ឃើញ​របប​ដឹកនាំ​ត្រូវ​បាន​ផ្លាស់ប្ដូរ ទី​២ ប្រជាជន​ថៃ និង​កម្ពុជា ស្អប់​ខ្ពើម​របប​ដឹកនាំ​ចាក់ឫស​នៅ​ក្នុង​ប្រទេស​រៀងៗ​ខ្លួន ទី​៣ ប្រជាជន​ថៃ និង​កម្ពុជា ចង់​បាន​យុត្តិធម៌​សង្គម ទី​៤ បើ​សិន​ណា​មាន​ការ​បោះ​ឆ្នោត​នៅ​​ឆ្នាំ​២០១២ និង​ឆ្នាំ​២០១៣ នៅ​កម្ពុជា គឺ​ការ​បោះ​ឆ្នោត​នោះ​ត្រូវ​តែ​មាន​តម្លាភាព និង​សុចរិត​ដូច​ការ​បោះ​ឆ្នោត​នៅ​ប្រទេស​ថៃ​ផង​ដែរ ទី​៥ សម្រាប់​មេដឹកនាំ​គណបក្ស​ប្រឆាំង​ណា​មួយ​ដែល​ការពារ​អ្នក​ក្រីក្រ និង​ត្រូវ​បាន​រស់​នៅ​និរទេស​ខ្លួន​នោះ ការ​អវត្តមាន​រូបកាយ គឺ​មិន​សំខាន់​ដូច​គុណធម៌​នោះ​ទេ។

នៅ​គ្រា​ដែល​កម្ពុជា តៀម​រៀប​ចំ​ការ​បោះ​ឆ្នោត​សាកល នៅ​ថ្ងៃ​ទី​២៨ ខែ​កក្កដា ឆ្នាំ​២០១៣ ខាង​មុខ​នោះ មេដឹកនាំ​គណបក្ស​ប្រជាជន​កម្ពុជា គឺ​លោក ជា ស៊ីម បាន​ប្រកាស​នៅ​ថ្ងៃ​ទី​២៨ ខែ​មិថុនា ឆ្នាំ​២០១១ ថ្មីៗ​នេះ​ថា គណបក្ស​នេះ​គាំទ្រ​បេក្ខភាព​របស់​លោក ហ៊ុន សែន បន្ត​ធ្វើ​ជា​នាយករដ្ឋមន្ត្រី​សម្រាប់​អាណត្តិ​ទី​៥ និង​អាណត្តិ​ក្រោយៗ​ទៀត៕

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Interesting article; appearently it is strange for CPP to endorse PM Hun Sen for life as Prime Minister but it is ok for Sam Rainsy to be President of Sam Rainsy party for life. Isn't that the same thing? I thought it was small civil war rather than a coup. Both sides has weapons and shooting each others. Both sides has tanks etc. May be it is a coup attempted failed. Is it justify to kill those people? No it is not. However, in the heat of the battle, if you dont shoot them, they will shoot you. The choice is yours..What would you do? Some said, well they were unarmed, yes it is true. This is Cambodia; it nothing new. It happened when King Sihanouk in power, it happened when Lon Nol in power, it happened when KR in power and it happen when CPP in power. If you can't stand the heat, stay out from the kitchen.

Anonymous said...

It's kill or be killed world. Until you're in the same situation, you are just an analyst talking from second hand knowledge and experience.

Anonymous said...

So Warrior Blood, 1997 coup was very normal routine thing in Cambodia? Damages was done, people get killed, included the innocent. So what, it happened many times in Cambodian history, why make a big deal of this one, right? Who the fuck are you, man? If you can't stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen. What the fuck do you mean by that? What the fuck are you thinking. Are you high on drug or low on life?

Anonymous said...

What I am saying is that if you play politic in Cambodia, dont be niave that it will like western style. Western style is as cut throat but non violence way, althought some time you see fist flying in the parliament too. If your opponent has guns and army too; what you going to do? Just stand there and let them take over?
The person that going into Cambodian politic and expected to be walking in the park is the one that is brain damage from smoking crack. You got to be in the dream land. "If you can stand the heat, stay out of the kitchen", mean dont play Cambodian politic if you are not for the challenges. It is very simple. You think western politics is nice walking in the park, you got to be dreaming. It is as cut throat as in Cambodia except the violence part but back door dealings etc. are the same. When the last time you running any election campaign? Exactly, NONE. I rest my case.

Anonymous said...

Warrior Blood,
It was a coup because Ranaridhh won the election and Hun sen lost the election. Hun Sen was in power because Ranariddh agreed to share power with Hun Sen because Hun Sen refused to give up power. When someone toppled an elected leader by force, it is called a coup. How can you accuse Funcinpec of launching a coup against Hun Sen? Funcinpec was the election winner and Hun sen was the loser. So, you mean the winner launched a coup against the loser? Ridiculous! If Funcinpec refused to share power, maybe UNTAC troops might force Hun Sen to give up power. Again, Hun Sen was not supposed to be in power because he lost the election. So, when the loser used force to topple the winner, it's called a coup.

Anonymous said...

Your comment that PM Hun Sen was not suppose to be in power is incorrected; He lost the election but it was a landslide lost; he has almost equally same number of seats in the parliament. He refused to step down is corrected but King Sihanouk again with his method to the madness put two tigers in the same cage. What do you think the outcome will be? Each plotting against each other; the sad part is Ranaridhh is no match to the peasant boy who knew the street life like the back of his hand. He was KR soldier and raise by Buddhist Monk when he was young because he parents cannot afford schooling. After they both agreed to rule together with Sihanouk as the parents to the bride and groom, then both sides finding ways to kill each other from power. Dont just looks at Ranaridhh as innocent in this deal. He is as guilty as any body. This why I said, it was small civil war or if you call it a coup then it was coup attemped fail. It was not a walk in a park dealing with Ranaridhh and his army. The day before the coup, Ranaridhh called PM Hun Sen ask permission to leave the country for business meeting or something then the everything broke loose the next day. Why do you think he left the country a day prior and his troops moving in Phnom Penh and fought with PM Hun Sen troops? Why he didnt mention anything to PM Hun Sen? Ranaridhh is dirty politician and he couldn't care less for others that were killed as long as he is in power. Those people that were killed, they do everything to please Ranaridhh in return, they will get better position etc. Do you know how corrupted he was when he was in power? Is that someone you want to be your leader? Not me. You can have him. This is why I said, if you play Cambodian politics, you have to better ready for the bullet flying over your head. America use to settle dispute that way too, that is why the name wild wild west came in to play. Just looks at Clint Eastwood movie.

Anonymous said...

3:30 AM, Hun Sen lost the election and Funcinpec at that time did not need his CPP to form a government. There were 120 seats in the parliament. Funcinpec won 58, Son Sann's Buddhist Liberal Democratic Party won 10, Moulinaka won 1 and the CPP won 51.
The winning party needs 2/3 to forma government. Initially, Funcinpec wanted to form a government with Son Sann and Moulinak only. They got more than 2/3 with these 3 parties forming together (169 seats out of 120 seats), but Hun sen threatened war and secession, so Sihanouk wanted to prevent war, that's why he proposed a coalition to stop Hun Sen's madness. In a real democratic country, the winner form any government it wanted, but the power-hungry loser Hun Sen refused to step down.
You said Sinahouk had put two tigers in the same cage, so in you it was a mistake to allow Hun sen to share power with Ranariddh. this indicate my point that Hun sen, as a loser, should stay as an opposition at that time. And that's why I said Hun Sen staged a coup in 1997 because he, as the loser, toppled an election winner in a violent force. Funcinpec was not the one that stage the coup because it was the winner.