A Change of Guard

សូមស្តាប់វិទ្យុសង្គ្រោះជាតិ Please read more Khmer news and listen to CNRP Radio at National Rescue Party. សូមស្តាប់វីទ្យុខ្មែរប៉ុស្តិ៍/Khmer Post Radio.
Follow Khmerization on Facebook/តាមដានខ្មែរូបនីយកម្មតាម Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/khmerization.khmerican

Saturday 24 August 2013

Remarkable Signs of True Democracy for Cambodia and Myanmar

The CNRP President 
The NLD President Aung San Suu Kyi
The NLD supporters
The CNRP supporters
By ខែ្មរវឌ្ឍនកម្ម

​       Currently the people of Cambodia and Myanmar are struggling their ways toward true democracy in their countries. For Cambodia, the democratic principle implanted by the Paris Peace Accord in 1991 has never prosperously grown to its potential but marred by the ruling party,the CPP which has never had a good will to further democracy instead to lead the country toward dictatorship. For Myanmar, the crackdown on pro-democracy movements, the house arrest of Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi, and the nullity of election results by the Military Junta in 1989 have held the country backward from a step toward democracy. But now both peoples have determined to bring true democracy for their countries, which they have cried for long enough. Nonetheless, historically, the political situations of the two countries have developed in different context.

       Myanmar, the country that has similar size and the number of population (60 millions) with Thailand, had won its independence from Great Britain in 1948 and embraced itself with democratic principle that had been implanted by the  British Empire. But the country fell under the Junta rule in 1962 when the military coup led by General Ne Win,  had removed President U Nu ( a democratic elected president) from the power accusing him of too much favoring of Buddhism and many ethnic minorities in the country. The Military Junta has ruled the country in authoritarian style with socialism economy by nationalizing all the country mid-size and large businesses while allowing some degree of freedom in religion, small businesses,  organizations, and expression but very limited in politics. In 1989,the collapse of Berlin Wall and subsequently the whole Communist system in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union along with mass protest by the students had sent political messages for the Military Junta to reform their political system by allowing the first meaningful election in the country.

     The National League for Democracy, the NLD won the election but ignored by the Junta, and many NLD activists including Ms. Suu kyi have been placed in jails or house arrests by the military government until 2011. when the new civilian government led by President Thein Sein has made the genuine political and economic reforms, Ms.Suu Kyi and most of her supporters were released from the house arrests and jails. This new political development has received  great welcome from the international community especially the US and the EU. Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi was invited to the White House and the US Congress, and she was warmly greeted and honored by President Obama and the Members of the Congress as the champion of democracy in the world. And in 2012, President Obama has become the first US President to visit Myanmar in history. Along with diplomatic triumph in the broad, the NLD led by Ms. Suu Kyi swept the landslide victory over the by-election that had conducted to fill in the parliamentary vacancies 45 seats from among 664 seats. The NLD won 43 seats from the 45 seats in the contest. Such a remarkable victory of the NLD in this fractional election has previewed the great coming victory of the NLD in 2015 general election that will finally bring the true democracy to the people of Myanmar who have fought hard and sacrificed for over half a century.

      Historically, Cambodian people have gone through more turbulent time than the Myanmar people :the brutal war followed by the killing fields, the Vietnamese invasion fallowed by another protracted war against the Vietnamese occupation until the Paris Peace Agreement 1991. Although Cambodia had received the first free and fair election sponsored by the UN, but the fruit of the Paris Peace Accord and the UN mandate have completely waned and replaced by the quasi authoritarian regime of Prime Minister Hun Sen, a notorious leader in Cambodian history. Since the Paris Peace Accord 1991, Cambodia has adopted the principle of democracy and the constitutional monarchy in a new constitution, but in deed, it has only on the paper. In reality, Cambodia has still ruled by the de facto Communist regime through nepotism, intimidation, corruption, and election rig. During the time of the Paris Peace Conference probably no body had imagined that 20 years ahead the progress of democracy has stuck in such a current situation. So far Cambodia have finished its fifth election and each election has been marred by a systematic fraud [ more technical proofs have divulged by the CVCUS recently] by the ruling party, the only winner in every election.

      If the election is free and fair, the CNPR will sweep the landslide victory as the NLD did in the by-election in 2012. But compared to Myanmar, democracy in Cambodia has regressed and waned, but on the contrary, the hearts and the will of Cambodian people are much stronger, more determined, and more united than ever before. The 55 seats out of 123 seats from an unofficial election results are not the numbers the people have expected for the performance of the CNRP but merely the left over numbers from all means of fraud committed by the ruling party, the CPP. The more the CPP have intimidated and cheated, the harder and stronger the people will have resisted them. Such a dubious election result has shown that Cambodia is still far behind Myanmar in term of the progression of democracy even though it has reformed its political system over 20 years ahead of Myanmar. Because the CPP, the proxy of Hanoi, has no political will to bring true democracy and justice to the people, for it would be a political suicide for themselves. Their undeserved power has not come from the hearts and the will of the people but deceived them.

        Politically, Cambodian people not only have struggled for true democracy and justice but also the survival for their country from a powerful neighbor, Vietnam that historically as well as currently has deeply interfered into Cambodia internal affairs which is a real imminent obstacle to peace, stability, and true democracy to Cambodia. Without such Hanoi's interference, Cambodian people would have enjoyed true democracy that all the super powers in the world had granted them at the Paris Peace Conference. But, unfortunately, this principle of true democracy has been robbed and destroyed by the Hanoi's proxy CPP which has ruled the country by all unjust means. Through the CPP, Hanoi has polarized and broken up the unity of Cambodian people in order to control and to swallow Cambodia through their historic political blueprint of greater Indochina Federation in the region. Whereas, Myanmar has no such a circumstance surrounding it. The military leaders are the Myanmar Nationalists; they came to rule the country on their own political agenda and faith: not the lackey, the puppet, the protege, and the proxy of any outside power in compare to Hun Sen and his CPP. Meanwhile, their two greater neighbors, China and India have always treated them in mutual respect. Albeit China seems to have more influence in the country, but it is in term of equal and mutual benefits for both countries. And as the country in process of political reform, the China influence has started to fade away too; recently the Myanmar government has cancelled about 4 billion dollar of Chinese investment and probably replaced it with the investments from the US, the EU or Japan which usually are more sustainable and transparent than the investment from China.

        The People of Myanmar and Cambodia have suffered similarly from the Military Junta's brutal rule and the Communist dictatorship rule of the notorious leaders Pol Pot and Hun Sen. But now the people of the two countries have been on the process to finish the dictatorship which ruled by one privilege man or group. The by-election landslide victory of the NLD in early 2012 is a promising sign that the 2015 general election will definitely bring a true democracy and change for Myanmar. For Cambodia, the election process and the post-election crisis have proved that Cambodia democracy which has been implanted by the UN for over two decades has no room to grow but to dwindle. The continuous power grip by the CPP, the de facto Communist party, is a real obstacle to sustainable democracy proliferation in Cambodia.  Nevertheless, the newly unofficial election result that even marred by massive fraud has indicated that the promising of true democracy is not far away from sights when the people have apprehended to the roots of the problems and determined to solve them together.

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

Cambodia and Myanmar are very similar, but please don't post any pictures of of sam rainsy and Aung San Suu Kyi for comparison.

These two individual are totally different. Aung San Suu Kyi never stole money from her party and later kicked out. Aung San Suu Kyi never left her country even though she was threaten with prison and her husband having cancer and later dying from it. Aung San Suu Kyi never left her country to attend her spouse's funeral. Aung San Suu Kyi never left her country to raise her child and see him grow up. Aung San Suu Kyi stayed in country when times were tough. Aung San Suu Kyi sacrifice everything she had blood and tears for the better of her country. She never ran away or seek any type of amnesty. She never backed away from her beliefs. Aung San Suu Kyi is a true political prisoner. She is the true identity of her country.

So please make sure you check your facts before you ever start comparing sam ranisy with Aung San Suu Kyi. These two individual are far different from one another.

Anonymous said...

សូមកោតសរសើរ ដោយឣស់ពីពោះពីពង់ ចំពោះសេចក្តីក្លាហាន ឣង់ឣាច ពុះពារឧបសគ្គ គ្រប់បែបយ៉ាង និងមនសិការ ជាតិ ដ៏ខ្ពង់ខ្ពស់ របស់លោកសម រង្សី និងកឹម សុខា ដែលក្លាហាន ហ៊ានចេញមុខ ងើបឡើង តស៊ូដឹកនាំ គណៈបក្សប្រឆាំង ជាផ្លូវការ ប្រឈមមុខ នឹងឧបស័គ្គគ្រប់បែបយ៉ាង ទាំងចំហ ទាំងឣាថ៌ កំបាំង ប្រឈមមុខ នឹងការចោទប្រកាន់ ចាប់ចង កាត់ទោស ញាត់គុក ប្រឈមមុខនឹង ការលួចធ្វើឃាដ ដោយលួចបាញ់សម្លាប់ ឬដោយគប់ឬបំផ្ទុះគ្រាប់បែក សម្លាប់រង្គាល គ្រប់ពេលវេលា។
ក្នុងស្រុកខ្មែរសព្វថ្ងៃ ពោរពេញទៅដោយឣ្នកប្រាជ្ញគរជើង មានសញ្ញាប័ត្រខ្ពស់គ្រាក់ៗ Ph.D មានឧត្តមសេនីយ ពាក់ផ្កាយ ព្រោងព្រាត មានសញ្ញាប័ត្រគ្រាក់ Ph.D ថែមទៀត តើមានឣ្នកក្លាហាន ណាមួយទៀត ហ៊ានងើបឡើងដឹកនាំរាស្ត្រ រកយុត្តិធម៌ ជូនរាស្ត្រឬទេ? ពេលនេះមានឣ្នកក្លាហាន ណាមួយទៀត មានប្រជាប្រិយជាងលោកសម រង្សី និងកឹម សុខា គួរតែចេញមុខ មកដឹកនាំចលនា រកយុត្តិធម៌ ជូនសង្គមជាតិ។ ពេលនេះ រាស្ត្រទូទៅ ទាំងចាស់ ទាំងកណ្តាល ទាំងក្មេង ពិសេសយុវជន កំពង់រង់ចាំ កំពង់ត្រូវការឣ្នកហើយ សូមឣ្នកដឹកនាំវ័យក្មេង ចេញមក!

Anonymous said...

- ពេលនេះ រាស្ត្រទូទៅ ទាំងចាស់ ទាំងកណ្តាល ទាំងក្មេង ពិសេសយុវជន កំពង់រង់ចាំ កំពង់ត្រូវការ ឣ្នកដឹកនាំវ័យក្មេងហើយ សូមឣ្នកដឹកនាំវ័យក្មេង ដ៏មានប្រជាប្រិយ ចេញមក! រាស្ត្រខ្មែរកំពង់ត្រូវការឣ្នកហើយ សូមចេញមក ៗៗៗ!

- ពេលនេះ ទោះជាយ៉ាងណាក៏ដោយ ទោះជាគ្មានឣ្នកណាទៀត ធ្វើបានប្រហែល លោកទាំងពីរ ក៏ដោយ ក៏នៅតែមាន ជនឣគតិ ទុរគតិ ចំតិតគូថ ចំកោងខ្នង ជំទាលជេរ លោកទាំងពីរ ទាំងបិទភ្នែកដែរ ម្យ៉ាងដោយឣគតិ ឬម្យ៉ាងទៀត ដោយស៊ីលុយគេ ត្រូវតែជេរឲ្យគេ។

Karl [Kalonh] Chuck said...

Yup, Yup, Hun Sen and his pigs lost the election!!!

Khmer people have spoken!!!

People around the world have spoken!!!

Hun Sen and his pigs must go!!!

HUN SEN Vietminh/Vietcong, GO GOME!!!

Anonymous said...

To 4:22, the author did not mention any Sam Rainsey name in the whole article or compared Ms.Suu Kyi to him, but instead the author tried to compare the two people struggles and the two dictatorship rules and the CNRP and NLD. If he chose to compare Sam Rainsey and Ms. Suu Kyi, there is nothing wrong, for they both fight for democracy for their people. You better read the whole text not look at the pictures.

Anonymous said...

To 1:58, It's not about looking at the picture or reading the texts. If you actually knew who sam ranisy really was you might have a different opinion. ranisy does not fight for democracy, he fights for himself. Everything about him is merely for the benefit of his status. ranisy hates the Cambodian monarch. Do you know why he hates the Cambodian monarch? His father hated the Cambodian monarch. He fought against King Sihanouk. He was just as corrupted as the leaders of Cambodia today. I'm not saying that sam ranisy will turn up like his father, but why is it that he was kicked out of the royal party? If he was in it for the better of the country, he would united with the royal party to defend against cpp.

The leaders of Cambodia whether they be cpp, royal, or ranisy. None of are in it for the better of the country. They are all in it for themselves. There is no hope in Cambodia. We all lost our chance when the royal party won the election in 1993 and was not smart enough or willing enough to work together to help Cambodia. The royal party had their chance to change Cambodia for the better, but they were not willing enough to work together. Money and greedy change them. People like Prince Ranariddh and rainsy had a chance to work together and improve Cambodia, but at the end of the day personal greedy separated the royal party and ranisy and they lost any hope against defending Cambodia against cpp.

Don't tell me to read the whole text and not look at the picture. I'm looking at the bigger picture. I grew up in Cambodia and I've seen and meet these individuals. ranisy is no better than cpp. You just haven't seen what he can do yet when does have control of Cambodia.

Also before you criticize who I maybe or insult my opinion or what type of person I am. I want to make it clear that I am not against you or your beliefs. I respect your opinion, but I don't have to agree with it, much like how you don't agree with my opinion. I'm just another Cambodian who loves his country. I don't have any power to improve it or to change it, but I do want people to be aware that ranisy is not the answer for Cambodia. How many times have ranisy criticized Cambodia's current government and left the country when times were tough? How many times has he stayed in Cambodia to fight for what you say is democracy? Yeah he fights for democracy during times he feel that he can get away with what he is saying, but at the end of the day he leaves for France and never stand strong against the face of cpp. The people that have to endure his actions are the Cambodian people. They are ones that are punished, placed in jails, and even worse killed.

The true people that fight for Cambodia are the Cambodian people, the villagers, the students, the monks, the elders, and any other Cambodian citizen who just wants their country to prosper like other countries around the world. These people don't have the benefit of leaving to another country when faces against cpp like ranisy. ranisy has been pardon more than once. That is just one time too many.

In conclusion, yes I do agree the text made no reference that rainsy is Aung San Suu Kyi, but having a picture of ranisy with Aung San Suu Kyi is an insult. rainsy has not one bit endure the pain and sacrifice of Aung San Suu Kyi. Aung San Suu Kyi fights for democracy, while ranisy fights for himself camouflage as democracy.

Anonymous said...

We have valued Sam Rainsey based on his past 20 years real actions not based on what you have said. Your comment is out of touch of reality.

Anonymous said...

Out of touch with reality? You will see what ranisy's reality is all about...don't get your hopes up.

School of Vice said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
School of Vice said...


It's the same old divisive tactic coming from people who fear popular democratic change for obvious reasons.

They would look and dig into every aspect of the life of any prominent opponent of the hated CPP regime to try to find dirt with which to discredit him/her in the eyes of his/her followers and other concerned opinions, and if they can't find any dirt either in that individual's past or public conduct, they would bring up spuriously argued or invented details or unwholesome aspects of that person's private life.

I won't dwell too long on the negative tactics posted above, but readers should beware of the fact that even the saintly Ms Suu Kyi has had to live with all kinds of cheap, underhand charges directed at her name and person, including her being married to a foreigner [an English scholar] and her having borne him two children by that marriage; that she is out on a personal vendetta to avenge the death of her [national hero] father at the hands of sections of the Burmese military whose power and influence is still being felt in Burma today, and so forth.

Aren't any of these charges sounding rather strikingly familiar to the respective charges directed at individuals like Ms Sokhua and Mr Rainsy? If they are, then there's every chance that the people who spew these accusations are cuts from the same cloth even if they happen to be from two different countries, but these are essentially people with axe to grind, and indeed, a great deal of fear [as Ms Suu Kyi herself has said] of losing their grip on power and stake to the forces of decency and justice by means of genuine democratic change demanded by the masses themselves. To think that being married to a foreigner [European] is an act of ultimate betrayal and sin, and to think that the very same group of people [the accusers] fail to find it hypocritical and inconsistent to label the accused of exploiting 'xenophobia' or playing 'the racist card' simply because these individuals [the accused] use the word "youn" to engage their supporters, who mostly have never known or used any other terms in their culture or every day speech!



Anonymous said...

Sam Rainsy might not have the same international stature as Aung San suu Kyi, but his is close enough to hers.

The difference is the Burmese military is not as cruel as Hun sen, they will never kill Suu Kyi. But Hun sen is very cruel, so he might kill Rainsy that's why he has to escape to save his life first.

Anonymous said...

How do you know that the Burmese military is not as cruel as hun sen? The Burmese military killed and imprison thousands of Burmese students and supporters of Aung San Suu Kyi. Burmese generals have spend millions of dollars on themselves example $30 million dollar on their daughters wedding, while the people of Burma suffers.

Aung San Suu Kyi's father was killed by the Burmese military. How do you know that they won't do the same to her? She was imprisoned in Burma while her husband died from cancer. She was imprisoned in Burma while her son grew up in another country without his parents. There is no evidences what so ever to suggest that the Burmese military won't ever not threaten Aung San Suu Kyi's life.

If Hun sen wanted sam rainsy dead, he would have done it back on 1997 when cpp took over full control of Cambodia from royal party in a coup.

What makes sam rainsy so similar to Aung San Suu Kyi? Nothing! He recently left Cambodia after the election to attend his daughter's wedding. He left the country during an important time right after the elections.

Aung San Suu Kyi has not shown any signs of escaping to save her life first. The only thing that she has done is remain in her country to defend what she feel is for the better of Burma.

sam rainsy has left the country on many occasions.There is nothing of sam rainsy that is close to Aung San Suu Kyi. Just because rainsy yells and protest for democracy doesn't mean he is close to the work that Aung San Suu Kyi has done. sam ranisy still has a long ways to go. There is nothing close about this.

Anonymous said...

If there is a person who has come close to the cause of Aung San Suu Kyi it is Mu Sochua. She so far have not ditched Cambodia during tough times and have stood strong against hun sen's threats.