12 August 2012
By Davan Long
Letter to the Bangkok Post
Postbag
The spat over disagreements in wording
which resulted in the omission of the post-summit joint statement
altogether at the Asean summit in Phnom Penh last month seems to have
regrettably taken on a life of its own, and grows uglier as each day
goes by, with no clear end in sight.
The hot topic now is no longer the absence of the joint statement, but how the fallout has been dealt with.
Less than two weeks after the
summit ended, it was agreed by the member states to adopt six principles
which, according to Cambodian officials, were the very same principles
tabled by Cambodia as the meeting's chair but were categorically
rejected by Vietnam and the Philippines during the meeting.
Despite that commendable
progress, thanks in large part to the intense diplomatic manoeuvring
from Indonesia, Cambodia and the Philippines continue to
uncharacteristically trade barbs in public.
It is fashionable to hold the
chair accountable for an undesirable incident. That said, the absence of
the post-summit joint statement, should not come as a complete surprise
to anyone who is familiar with the organisation's limited mandate to
deal with issues as politically charged as the South China Sea dispute.
Now Asean finds itself
dangerously on a head-to-head collision course with a veto-wielding
member of the UN Security Council right in its backyard. At the same
time the United States is increasing its rhetoric and presence in the
region to counter China's growing assertiveness in its jurisdictional
claims in the South China Sea. As some observers have nervously put it,
the aggressive postures taken by both sides could signal the beginning
of the militarisation of the issue.
Facing such a highly volatile
situation, it can be said that it was prudent for Cambodia, as the
group's chair, to opt to behave in a manner consistent with Asean's
traditional non-confrontational approach. Unfortunately, there was a
price to be paid for that wise decision - the breakdown of Asean's
cohesiveness. The summit in Phnom Penh should not be allowed to become
an endless finger-pointing exercise. It is time to turn the page, and
move on with the real goals the group has set to accomplish.
3 comments:
Most Cambdian live around the world don't like the today Cambodian government, leading by the CPP. But as Khmer born we will laways loyal to our Country Cambodia.
We all know the different between internal and external polilic, therefore we support the Cambodian governement for their external political decision.
I support the Khmer, but i will never support the CPP politics whether externally or internally.
CPP politics is never about the survival of our nation but the survival of their power whether it means killing one of their own CPP dog or killing young girls or killing the environmentalists.
CPP will do anything to stay in power. Killing is easy for them since they have been killing khmer since the 1970. All thanks to the Vietnamese for training the Pol Pot and training the Vietminh Hun Sen.
We must remove the CPP and support external politics and help them to remove the CPP if we are to help our country.
Support the government for their external decision, including ceding land to neighboring countries? Those who support the traitorous government that give lands to neighboring countries are as much traitorous like government that they support.
We must support the ruler who protects our nation, but we should never support a ruler/government that give lands to neighboring countries.
Post a Comment