A Change of Guard

សូមស្តាប់វិទ្យុសង្គ្រោះជាតិ Please read more Khmer news and listen to CNRP Radio at National Rescue Party. សូមស្តាប់វីទ្យុខ្មែរប៉ុស្តិ៍/Khmer Post Radio.
Follow Khmerization on Facebook/តាមដានខ្មែរូបនីយកម្មតាម Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/khmerization.khmerican

Sunday 20 June 2010

'Enemies of the People': My Body Is Spinning Inside



My future depends on what is recorded here.
Nuon Chea


“They arrested him and took him to the rice field. They killed him by thrashing by knives,” Thet Sambath says. His father, he goes on, “did not die immediate. He very, very suffer. My brother, he watch.” Sambath’s father was a farmer, a “country person.” Just a boy when his father died, reportedly because he would not give up a cow to the Khmer Rouge, Sambath is now a senior reporter with the Phnom Penh Post. For years, in his spare time, he’s been seeking answers to the question that has shaped his life: “why the killing happened.”

Sambath tells his story in the astonishing documentary Enemies of the People, screening 20 June at the Human Rights Watch Film Festival at Lincoln Center. He interviews some of the killers, gently probing their memories, as well as Nuon Chea, also known as Brother Number Two. “I wasn’t the right man to lead the party,” he says now. And so Nuon Chea appointed Pol Pot Secretary of the Communist Party of Kampuchea in 1962.

Sambath spends years talking to Nuon Chea, visiting his home in Pailin, sharing meals and recording him. “I tell him this film is not for journalism, it is for history,” Sambath narrates. He doesn’t tell what happened to his own family (after his father’s death, his mother was forced to marry a Khmer Rouge soldier, then died in childbirth), until Nuon Chen is about to be flown to Phnom Penh, where he has awaited trial since September 2007.

Sambath ponders his deceit throughout this stunning documentary, which he co-directed with Rob Lemkin. He wants to gain his subject’s trust, he explains, so that he will reveal his part in the Killing Fields. As Sambath contemplates his process, on his questions and his hopes to find “the truth,” the film makes such complications visible in multiple frames, both his interviews and self-reflections presented on laptop screens, editing monitors, and video camera displays. He replays interviews, rehears stories, seeking answers, the replication suggesting how hard it is to decipher accounts, find motives and accept what people have done.

Maybe “accept” is not the right word. Consider the title, Enemies of the People. Nuon Chea uses the phrase to describe victims of the regime, people assumed to be in league with the dreaded Vietnamese, who became problems that needed to be “solved.” After the Americans bombed Cambodia and Laos and then fled Saigon (black and white newsreel footage alludes to the standard “history,” along with choice voiceover by Richard Nixon: “This is not an invasion of Cambodia”), Pol Pot endeavored to purge the countryside of opponents in order to achieve “revolutionary ideals.” As Nuon Chea speaks to Sambath’s camera, another camera observes their exchange. Nothing either man says is precisely true, but both proceed toward truth, or at least an understanding of one another.

Sambath’s performance is as fascinating as any of his subjects. Making his way across northwestern Cambodia, “the area where most killing happened,” he looks ahead. The camera pans beautiful scenes at dusk, trees and rice paddies, as well as land that still looks desolate, dusty and barren. During an interview with two killers, Khoun and Suon, a woman approaches. “Don’t film me,” she instructs the camera looking up at her silhouette. She remembers losing her husband, and the “boiling” caused when “decomposing flesh made bubbles.” “In 1979,” she says, “I was the first to return: there were so many bodies.”

As she speaks, the camera pans occasionally to Khoun and Suon, their faces lined and darkened by years of labor in the sun. They point to a tree or in another direction, down a road that now covers over a ditch, sites where they killed people. They appear repeatedly in the film, sometimes traveling with Sambath, for instance, to meet with Sister Em, who once gave them killing orders. They share regrets, and describe their feelings now: “I go back to the village where I killed people,” says Suon, his eyes moist. “I feel terrible, my mind, my soul, my body is spinning inside. All the things I did are flashing through my mind.” Still, neither man can detail why he committed atrocities. “The children saw their fathers smashed into the ditch,” recalls Khoun. “They cried out, ‘Please don’t hit my father, he hasn’t done anything.’ Then we took the kids and we killed them too.”

As cold as such memories can sound, sometimes the killers’ stories don’t quite coincide: they don’t acknowledge numbers of victims, or only work their way to confessions in roundabout ways). You can’t know whether this is a function of fading memories, confusion or deliberate obfuscation (“Frankly,” one says at one point, laughing weakly, “Without the wine, we wouldn’t dare kill people”). Enemies of the People doesn’t pretend to deliver a final or even a stable truth, a set of indisputable facts. Instead, it shows the truth of the process, efforts to be honest, to confront horrors, to remember and to forgive.

That process includes Samabath’s own tangle of emotions, the years he spends on the road, away from his wife and two children (his daughter smiles brightly for the camera, while his son, slightly older, lingers in the background, his face unreadable). Sambath’s wife scrubs clothes in a tub while he shaves, the camera peeking up at his mirror than cutting back to her in the next room. Again, multiple frames insinuate tenuous emotional links, efforts to communicate, missed connections. She laments his absence, appreciates his dedication. “I just think about people making thousands in offices and he’s out in the forest,” she says. “Sometimes I’m angry in my own head, but I never tell him. I don’t argue with him. I just wonder why he’s so different from other people.” She smiles, slightly. “He may not even notice I’m angry.”

Sambath seeks an end to his quest. During an early interview with Khoun and Suon, he asks from off-screen why they’ve agreed to come with him to a place where bodies are buried. “Because you asked me to prove it,” Khoun says. “I want to tell the truth exactly as it happened.” Even as he speaks, you see this is impossible. Even as the film records confessions, including Nuon Chea’s, the monstrosity of their actions renders words ineffective, ever incomplete. Sambath notes during one session with Nuon Chea that, “This is the first time a Khmer Rouge leader has admitted killing.” The video frame remains steady (marked as such) on the old man’s face unnervingly serene face, as he explains, “We would investigate someone gradually, until we knew his full background. Then we would solve him.”

The euphemism, like the violence it doesn’t quite describe, is utterly chilling. The moment passes, the scene cuts to Sambath, recording.

4 comments:

KhmerIsrael said...

Enemies of the people were not Pol Pot, Noun Chea and whoever else. These were only puppets of their Master, HaSatan. I read alot about Hun Sen being a puppet of Vietnam. May be so, but Vietnam gov' is a puppet of HaSatan to inflict more death to whom it is oppressing. This is true reality that humanity is under a rulership of HaSatan at the present age. Satan's agenda is to kill and destroy! All humanity exibit Satan character because we have inherited the seed of evil and good. The devil was a murder from the beginning and he will continues to do so until his authority is taken away from him by Yeshua.

Anonymous said...

12:52 AM,

How come your devil by the name of HaSatan never dares to come to modern countries like US, Japan, etc.?

Your Yeshua is just as guilty as your HaSatan since he still has not taken away the so-called authority from Mr.Hasatan.

Anonymous said...

KhmerIsreal, would you please stop taking every opportunity to inject and mix your religion with Cambodia's politic. Okay..so all the evil doers were possessed by the HaSatan(Satan or Arak Satang). It's like saying," Oh..it's not their faults, the evil HaSatan told them to do it." How irresponsible is that. Heck..let's take HaSatan to Tribunal court, don't take Pol Pot, Noun Chea, or whoever, it wasn't their faults.. that's a bunch of B.S to me. So if someone punches you in the face, blame HaSatan for it, HaSatan told that someone to do it.

And this Yeshua(Jesus Christ?)will someday put a stop to HaSatan by waging "good vs. evil" war to save humanity? Only with the help of god's teaching can human find a path to save themselves, in my opinion that is. I thought god not suppose to kill, that is killing the devil. The way I see it, god instructed human to do good, that is if they want to go to heaven, however; if human do evil things, they cannot go to heaven when they die, their souls are tainted, the devil will take their souls to hell for certain punishment according to their level of evil, god cannot save them, even if they accept god and cry out to god for help.

KhmerIsrael said...

Religion dictates politics!
That is if your religion is base on a sure foundation. How else will a society have stability without moral absolute? Get the spiritual compass fix and you will sail with the wind and not contrary against the wind.

Talk about CPP is so corrupted; that is because the leaders are depleted of moral absolute. There is no truth in their beliefs.

Here is the spiritual truth from the word of God; "Seek you first the kingdom of God and his righteousness and all others things will be added unto you."

Did you seek first the kingdom of God today? Did the nation Cambodia seek first God's kingdom today? If not, why should God "add the other things" to them?

If Pol Pot and all his clans taught the message of seeking first the Kingdom of God and his righteousness unto the people and treated them like people, than, I beg the out come would had been different. But he, instead, taught the lie of his father the devil and slaughtered them like the devil would.