A Change of Guard

សូមស្តាប់វិទ្យុសង្គ្រោះជាតិ Please read more Khmer news and listen to CNRP Radio at National Rescue Party. សូមស្តាប់វីទ្យុខ្មែរប៉ុស្តិ៍/Khmer Post Radio.
Follow Khmerization on Facebook/តាមដានខ្មែរូបនីយកម្មតាម Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/khmerization.khmerican

Tuesday, 27 April 2010

Remembering 'Year Zero' when Beijing-backed regime rammed socialism through

John Metzler Archive
World Tribune

Remembering 'Year Zero' when Beijing-backed regime rammed socialism through
UNITED NATIONS — Thirty-five years ago this week, the guns fell silent in Cambodia. The capital city Phnom Penh was captured by the Khmer Rouge communists and the war was finally over. Then an unfathomable reign of terror commenced pulling Cambodia into yet lower levels of the Indochinese inferno. Now a generation later, an UN-backed tribunal is trying key Khmer Rouge leaders “accused of mass killings and other crimes during the country’s genocide.”

During the rule of the Beijing-backed Pol Pot regime between 1975-1979, nearly two million Cambodians were killed by their own people in the name of communist utopianism. The Year Zero as it was called, was to forcibly transform Cambodia into a socialist state, which rivaled the radicalism even of Mao’s Cultural Revolution in Mainland China.

Neighboring Vietnam’s invasion of its old ethnic rival, Cambodia and the instillation of a puppet regime in 1979, interrupted the sanguinary rule of Democratic Kampuchea. Despite the illegality of the invasion and the dubious legitimacy of the rulers, (many of them former Khmer Rouge defectors), from a human rights perspective, and for the average Cambodian, the situation improved.

Yet Democratic Kampuchea was still the UN-recognized representative holding the seat of Cambodia. An annual political General Assembly debate brought together representatives of the Pol Pot regime, genuine nationalists, and the mercurial if bizarre Prince Sihanouk. The People’s Republic of China backed the Khmer Rouge, the U.S. Administration of Jimmy Carter had just recognized Beijing and thus was playing the China Card, and most developing countries opposed Hanoi’s invasion too. Thus there existed the political clout to produce resounding majorities contemning Vietnam’s illegal occupation of Cambodia.

In light of the condemnations of Vietnam, it almost became an afterthought that the Khmer Rouge had presided over the infamous Killing Fields, an indisputable genocide which tore the once gentle heart from this Indochina land, making the very name Cambodia synonymous with forced starvation, torture and death.

Given massive international political pressures, Vietnam withdrew from Cambodia and allowed a UN peacekeeping and political process with led to free and fair elections in the early 1990’s. Not surprisingly the old Kingdom of Cambodia was reestablished. By 2003 the UN and Cambodia agreed to a joint judicial Tribunal, tasked with trying leading Khmer Rouge figures. The Tribunal is composed of both Cambodian and foreign judges.

Recently the UN’s Chief Legal Counsel, Patricia O’Brien, visited the Phnom Penh-based Tribunal, officially called the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, (ECCC). After holding discussions with Cambodian officials, she stressed the continuing importance of the Tribunal, but called on donor countries to provide funding to support the ongoing judicial process.

The ECCC budget for 2010 stands at $45 million and is paid by both the Cambodian government and foreign donors. The Tribunal provides a full and proper legal frame- work with Trial and Appeals Chambers.

A trial of the notorious leader Kiang Guek Eav also known as “Duch” has finished and he is awaiting sentence. He was charged with crimes of torture and premeditated murder at the infamous S-21 camp. There will be at least a few more trials before the Tribunal winds down its mandate in 2015.

According to a statement, “The ECCC has confirmed its ability to conduct complex international criminal trials to international standards.” Yet the obvious question arises; with so many of the perpetuators of the Khmer Rouge genocide still alive, and many living openly in Cambodia, why is the Tribunal’s mandate so narrow?

Clearly there are large numbers in Cambodian society who are willing to turn the page on the past, or who more likely, fear returning to that past. Confronting the living ghosts of the Pol Pot regime raises fears and a specter of a Cambodia which existed before probably most of the current population was even born. The fragile peace, fractious democracy, and fluctuating economic development have moved forward but could quickly wilt in the hot-light of recriminations or perhaps worse. Revenge for the crimes of the genocidal regime is not the issue, but justice should be the indisputable goal.

John J. Metzler is a U.N. correspondent covering diplomatic and defense issues. He writes weekly for WorldTribune.com.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

I don't think John Metzler is technically correct to say the Khmer Rouge regime was backed by China. He made sound as though China was a sole responsibility. The creation of the Khmer Rouge regime was not by one source of China alone.

Communist was huge during that time, Soviet Union and communist China were the two big bosses. These two had their own ideology and agenda. China encouraged Cambodia to become a communist state by influencing Songkum ReasNiyum government, while the Soviet Unions had become a master of Hanoi, North Vietnam and would also like to see Cambodia to become a communist slave state. With the blessing off China, Soviet Union and Hanoi, the birth of Khmer Rouge regime was born, the the leader was Salath Sar(Pol Pot). Pol Pot was the chosen one because he had proven his loyalty with Hanoi during his service for the Viet Minh. Pol Pot chosen to be a leader of the Khmer Rouge regime was by accident. Anyway, there were two entities in the Khmer Rouge regime, half pro-China and the other half pro-Hanoi. However; when China as the Soviet Union no longer getting alone, so does the division in the Khmer Rouge regime. There were mass confusion. They were accusing and killing off each other .Finally in 1978, pro-Hanoi Khmer Rouge sought help from communist Vietnam and began the invasion and occupation of Cambodia by communist Vietnam.

Anonymous said...

It is true that the KR was backed by China. However, you are correct also to say that not only China, but the Soviet Union and North Vietnam were also KR backers.

Originally, China, the Soviet Union and North Vietnam were staunch supporters of the KR. But after the KR took power, the KR began to disobey Hanoi's pressures and domination and, due to border conflicts, the war broke out. China supported the KR and Hanoi turned to the Soviet Union to counter China's threats and attacks in the wake of Vietnam's invasion of Cambodia in 1979.

There were two camps of original KR- the Khmer Vietminh like Tou Samout, Heng Samrin, Chea Sim etc,who were pro-Vietnam Hanoi and the intellectual KR like Pol Pot, Son Sen, Ieng Sary, Nuon Chea, Hou Youn, Hu Nim etc, etc who were fiercely anti-Vietnam. However, both camps worked well along with North Vietnam and the Viet Cong at least from 1963-1975 because the KR needs Viet troops to help fight the American-backed Lon Nol troops. After they took powers from 1975, both camps began to differ in policy and internal rivalry and infighting started to take root and due to the mass confusion they killed each other like animals. Hu Nim, Hou Youn and others who were originally Pol Pot's allies were purged because of their oppositions to certain policies. So Phim, Moul Sambath (Ros Nhim)and others who were Khmer Vieminh and Issaraks were mercilessly purged because they were accused of Pro-Hanoi. Chea Sim, Heng Samrin and Hun sen escaped and joined Viet troops. You were very right on these points.