On Thursday morning garment workers gathered outside the US Embassy
in Phnom Penh to follow up with the petition they submitted on Januray
18th, 2013 asking the US government to pressure Wal-Mart.
They are owed $200,000 by Kingsland, a Hong Kong-based company that
started to operate in Cambodia 10 years ago and worked with Wal-Mart and
H&M suppliers.
Yon Sok Lein, one of the Kingsland’s workers, said that there was no
feedback from the US Embassy. “We would like Wal-Mart to be held
accountable for this situation. It is a big and powerful company. We
would also like the owner of the factory to be held accountable but he
left the country”. As a garment worker for Kingsland, Yon Sok Lein was
working on 1,000 pieces of underwear per day from 7 AM to 4 PM for $120
to $130 per month. There are 400,000 garment workers in Cambodia and 90%
of them are women.
A video published on January 20th by the independent Cambodian media Voice of Democracy,
shows garment workers outside Kingsland factory protesting for not
having been paid and blaming H&M and Wal-Mart. They have been
striking since January 3rd, 2013.
http://youtu.be/hlMKKFUJ2NQ
The workers have been told since September that they did not have to come to work anymore due to the lack of orders but that they would be paid 50% of they salary until
work would resume in January. But they never received the money before
the owners declared bankruptcy and left the country.
According to Wal-Mart, it stopped Kingsland’s products in 2011. H&M in June 2012. However, the Community Legal Education Center (CLEC)
gathered testimonies from worker stating that H&M alterations and
quality checks continued until the first week of September, 2012 and
that Walmart production continued until the same week. According to
CLEC, the H&M representative admitted it.
A 1997 progressive labor law?
Kingsland is famous for violating legislation and it is not the first
time such protests have occurred. In 2008, 16 workers were fired for
belonging to a union that was not recognized by the company. Despite
attempts to negociate their reintegration, none of them were able to go
back to work, suggesting that belonging to an independent union was
still problematic at Kingsland. This is in violation of the 1997 labor
law.
Cambodia still portrays an “ethical” label to international brands.
The country stands out among garment-exporting countries as one where
working conditions for factory workers have improved. Since the 1990s,
Cambodia has shaped a worker-friendly reputation to be able to compete
internationally. In 1997, a labor law was adopted that recognized rights
of Cambodian workers, such as ” the minimum wage must ensure every
worker of a decent standard of living compatible with human dignity”.
Today, the garment industry is the first source of income in the country
with more than US$4 billion profit a year. In 1999, the country also
agreed to submit an extensive labor inspection program that would be
coordinated by the International Labour Organization (ILO). In 2005, it
became a full member of the World Trade Organization (WTO).
Argued responsibilities?
Interviewed earlier this month by The Cambodia Daily,
Nick Rudikoff, global affairs coordinator of Warehouse Workers United
(WWU), a U.S.-based union representing 5.5 million workers in different
sectors, said that “Kingsland’s failure to inform the workers’ of their
situation is an example of Wal-Mart not making sure members of its
supply chain treat workers in a fair manner”.
Legally the factory owners are responsible for the workers’ severance
pay and working conditions. But as Dave Welsh, the head of the American
Centre for International Labor Solidarity, told Voice of Democracy last August
“it really is the brands putting the squeeze around the world on the
industry. But the industry doesn’t mind, because the people who suffer
are not the owners, the people who suffer are the workers.”
The International Labour Organization (ILO) established the “Better
Factories Cambodia” program (ILO-BFC) to monitor the compliance to the
1999 US – Cambodia bilateral trade agreement, generating reports about
working conditions in Cambodian factories. According to the latest one,
there is a need for a new industry-wide agreement as “the number of
strikes over the reporting period is twice as many for the same
reporting period [a year before]“. The reports records 27 strikes and
16 mass faintings between November 2011 and June 2012. This represents
more than 2,000 women fainting.
No comments:
Post a Comment