On a
Monday morning in January 1979, my boss Jerry Toobin, the news and
public affairs director at WNET, New York City’s public TV station (and
father of journalist Jeff Toobin), walked into our work area and said to
me and my fellow cubicle mates, “Bill Moyers would like to talk with
Prince Sihanouk. Anybody got an idea how to find him?”
Norodom
Sihanouk of Cambodia, who just died on October 15, age 89, was in the
United States to speak at the United Nations. After years of house
arrest, he had fled Cambodia ahead of invading Vietnamese troops and was
on his way to the UN to protest the invasion on behalf of the infamous
Khmer Rouge, Cambodia’s ruling regime.
Interest was high — it was
less than four years since America had left neighboring Vietnam and
Cambodian dictator Pol Pot had begun the genocide that murdered 1.7
million of that country’s people (the brutality vividly depicted in the
movie, “The Killing Fields”).
Pondering Bill and Jerry’s request, I
had one idea. On a remote chance, I called a friend of mine whose
husband was a Washington journalist who had been a reporter in Southeast
Asia. In 1970, he was held captive by guerillas in Cambodia for more
than a month, just days after President Nixon announced he was sending
troops into Cambodia (triggering the protests back home that led to the
killing of college kids at Kent State in Ohio and Jackson State in
Mississippi) and a few weeks after Sihanouk had been overthrown as
Cambodia’s head of state.
My friend answered the phone. “This is going to sound crazy,” I said, “but do you know how to reach Prince Sihanouk?”
She replied, “He’s coming over for dinner tomorrow night.”
After a stunned pause, I said, “Would you please tell him that Bill Moyers would like to talk with him?”
She
agreed to convey the message and a couple of days later, I received a
phone call from a member of Sihanouk’s entourage as they stopped at a
roadside fried chicken joint, driving from DC to New York. We made the
arrangements and the interview was on.
It was my first bizarre
contact with the strange, pragmatic, colorful and convoluted life of
Sihanouk, who had been crowned King of Cambodia at the age of 18 in
1941, then abdicated to become a prince in 1955, only to be named king
once again in 1993 (he would abdicate one more time, in 2004, although
he then took the title “king-father,” a sort of crowned head emeritus).
During
all those years, Sihanouk alternately sided with the French, the
Japanese (toward the end of World War II), then the French again, the
Chinese, the United States, North Korea, and Pol Pot’s “
hyper-communist”
Khmer Rouge. He even wound up repudiating the Khmer Rouge and backing
the Vietnamese whose invasion — which ended Pol Pot’s genocide — he had
come to the UN to denounce.
He was, as Mark McDonald described him in the
International Herald Tribune,
“a libertine and a francophile, a filmmaker and a painter, a serial
husband and father and philanderer, a cherubic but ruthless god-king who
liked to putter about in the garden. He played the sax in his own jazz
band. He loved to eat. He once served Champagne to a visiting U.S.
secretary of state. At 10 a.m.
“Most of all, of
course, King Norodom Sihanouk of Cambodia was the consummate political
flip-flopper, a shape-shifting monarch and realpolitik chameleon who
helped to lead the global nonaligned movement but also, at one time or
another, tethered his nation to the world’s major powers to preserve its
independence.”
Preserve its independence – and not coincidentally – his own neck.
The Washington Post noted in its obituary that
“his impulse to settle personal scores nearly ruined his country and
made him complicit in the Khmer Rouge holocaust,” and quoted Cambodia
observer Bruce Sharp:
“…Sihanouk had one critical
flaw: as much as he loved the Cambodian people, he loved himself just
slightly more. At a pivotal moment in Cambodian history, he chose his
own interests above those of Cambodia, and millions of people paid with
their lives.”
As a journalist, Bill Moyers naturally
was fascinated by Sihanouk’s life story and the tragedy of Cambodia.
Once a date was set, the production team went to the hotel where
Sihanouk was staying, selected a room for the interview and met with
State Department security. While they were conducting an initial sweep
of the interview site, I found myself alone in his suite with Sihanouk
and his wife, Princess Monique. She didn’t say a word and Sihanouk and I
sat stiffly and made awkward conversation in his less-than-perfect
English and my less-than-perfect, schoolboy French. I remember we talked
about movies, and then somehow segued into a discussion of poetry. It
was all very odd.
The next day, Bill taped his interview. He did a
great job and the conversation went well but it was difficult —
Sihanouk was eager to air his grievances against one and all, and the
Byzantine nature of Cambodian, Vietnamese and Chinese politics, the
names of various factions and their leaders tumbling from his lips, were
hard for an American audience to fully comprehend.
I’m not sure
if video or transcripts still exist from that day more than 33 years
ago, but I have the photo accompanying this piece, which was taken while
I spoke with Sihanouk during a tape change. Look closely and you can
read the notes on my legal pad — if you can decipher my scrawl. And I’m
not sure what I was saying to the prince, but he looks startled.
And
I still have the scrap of paper on which that day in the hotel suite
Sihanouk carefully had written for me the name of his favorite French
poet: “Alfred de Musset.”
Underneath, he added in a precise,
elegant hand, “XIX ieme siècle” — “19th century.” He asked if I had ever
heard of de Musset; I hadn’t. I must read him, Sihanouk insisted, and I
did.
Among his many poems, plays and novels, De Musset wrote “
The Confession of a Child of the Century.”
Given Sihanouk’s own chaotic and controversial life, over a span of
almost nine decades, it could have been the title of his own
autobiography.
1 comment:
How accurate the description of Sihanouk - he may love his Cambodian people but he loves himself more - much more!!! Anybody who claims to love his people would never contemplated in politically flip flopping and pursued personal grievances and adopted revenge against his own Cambodian people by orchestrating jungle call from the KR clandestine radio for his people to join the marqui, joined hand with the KR who he personally ordered annihilation, and the Vietnamese who declared despised. So what were the consequences - people died in the fighting, people died living under the KR regime, people died under the DK regime, people died during and after UNTAC of AIDS, of Hep_C...deseases that Cambodian society never knew of before. Such is the legacy of this PRICK !!!
Post a Comment