By Jonathan Manthorpe,
Vancouver Sun
The 10 countries of the Association of South East
Asian Nations have papered over the most serious rift in their 45-year
history on how to con-front Chinese aggression in disputed ocean
territory.
But the argument among foreign ministers meeting in the
Cambodian capital Phnom Penh a week ago puts at question whether the
governments are ready, willing or able to complete the free trade
agreement and policy integration required for the planned formation of
the ASEAN Economic Community by 2015.
The dispute, which led to
the ASEAN foreign ministers being unable for the first time in 45 years
to issue a final communi-que preparatory to the leaders summit later
this year, revealed with brutal clarity Beijing's ability to manipulate
to its own ends the inner counsels of the organization.
The
discord was sparked by China's increasingly assertive claims to own
almost all the South China Sea, which exploration shows covers very
large deposits of oil and natural gas.
In recent months Chinese
patrol boats have been involved in tense standoffs with vessels from the
Philippines and Vietnam, both of which assert economic rights over
large areas of the South China Sea based on claimed ownership of islands
in the Paracel and Spratly chains. China also has overlap-ping claims
with other littoral nations, Malaysia and Brunei.
The Manila
government's foreign minister Albert del Rosario, backed by Vietnam,
wanted the ASEAN Phnom Penh com-munique to make specific reference to
recent clashes between his country's coast guard and Chinese patrol
boats at Scar-borough Shoals, well within the Philippines' 200 nautical
mile exclusive economic zone.
However, Cambodia's Prime Minister
Hun Sen, who chaired the meeting and whose country's economy depends on
trade and aid from China, refused to allow the reference.
Hun Sen
parrots Beijing's position that the South China Sea disputes should be
settled bilaterally and not be tabled in international forums like
ASEAN.
Beijing dispelled any doubt there may have been that Hun
Sen was acting as a proxy for China by publicly thanking him for keeping
China's "core interests" in mind.
For relatively small and weak
countries like Vietnam and the Philippines dealing with China directly
and alone over these disputes clearly puts them at a huge disadvantage.
They
need the backing and support of ASEAN colleagues; otherwise China will
be able to dictate the format of negotiations. Beijing's starting point
is that it owns the South China Sea right down to Indonesian waters
about 1,200 kilometres from the nearest undisputed Chinese landfall, and
it has even designated this huge tract of sea and islands a Chinese
municipality with its own administration.
In a brisk and
purposeful round of shuttle diplomacy at the end of the last week,
Indonesia's Foreign Minister Marty Natalegawa managed to get agreement
from ASEAN members on a communique.
But that required the
Philip-pines and Vietnam to back down. In general terms, the statement
calls on ASEAN-promoted principles for peaceful resolution of maritime
disputes and resolving conflicts in accordance with international law.
The
statement also called for an early agreement between ASEAN and China on
a code of conduct for economic development of the South China Sea and
the avoidance of conflict.
The code has been under discussion since 2002 when ASEAN and China signed a joint declaration that they intend to move toward a legally binding agreement. In 2011 the parties agreed on guidelines for implementing the 2002 agreement, but they have made little progress toward actually producing a code of conduct.
Beijing's interest is to delay any agreement as long as possible so it can use its burgeoning navy and other initiatives to further establish a presence in the South China Sea.
Perhaps to that end, Beijing has said it is willing to meet ASEAN members in September to discuss the process for developing a code.
If that happens and can be portrayed as taking the process forward, China will probably be able to keep the dispute off the agenda of the East Asia summit in November.
Eighteen countries, including the United States, attend the East Asia summit. Washington has already shown great willingness to back the ASEAN states over the South China Sea, which the Barack Obama administration sees as a precedent-setting question of freedom of navigation.
The four ASEAN members in dispute with China - Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia and Brunei - are supported by Indonesia and Singapore in their position that the group should address Beijing on the issue.
But the other ASEAN states - Cambodia, Thailand, Laos and Burma - which either have land borders with China or major economic ties or both, are against pushing the issue as an organization.
That does not bode well for either the territorial dispute with China or for the project to build ASEAN into a fully fledged economic community.
jmanthorpe@vancouversun.com
The code has been under discussion since 2002 when ASEAN and China signed a joint declaration that they intend to move toward a legally binding agreement. In 2011 the parties agreed on guidelines for implementing the 2002 agreement, but they have made little progress toward actually producing a code of conduct.
Beijing's interest is to delay any agreement as long as possible so it can use its burgeoning navy and other initiatives to further establish a presence in the South China Sea.
Perhaps to that end, Beijing has said it is willing to meet ASEAN members in September to discuss the process for developing a code.
If that happens and can be portrayed as taking the process forward, China will probably be able to keep the dispute off the agenda of the East Asia summit in November.
Eighteen countries, including the United States, attend the East Asia summit. Washington has already shown great willingness to back the ASEAN states over the South China Sea, which the Barack Obama administration sees as a precedent-setting question of freedom of navigation.
The four ASEAN members in dispute with China - Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia and Brunei - are supported by Indonesia and Singapore in their position that the group should address Beijing on the issue.
But the other ASEAN states - Cambodia, Thailand, Laos and Burma - which either have land borders with China or major economic ties or both, are against pushing the issue as an organization.
That does not bode well for either the territorial dispute with China or for the project to build ASEAN into a fully fledged economic community.
jmanthorpe@vancouversun.com
No comments:
Post a Comment