The failure
of the ASEAN foreign ministers to issue a joint communiquè at their
meeting in Phnom Penh last week was definitely a significant setback for
the regional association. It was the first time in the association’s
45-year existence that the foreign ministers had failed to issue a joint
communiquè at the end of their regular annual meeting.
Such
joint communiquès are important. They record what the foreign ministers
discussed – or at least what they wanted the public to think they
discussed – and the issues on which they reached common positions. Now,
because of this failure, we, the public, have no way of knowing these
things, so that the foreign ministers will have to start all over again
at their meeting in 2013 under Brunei’s chairmanship, with the
circumstances at the time in mind and still, at present, unknown. At the
same time, this year, the disagreements within ASEAN –and, contrary to
popular perception, the South China Sea was not the only contentious issue – have been exposed to public view in all their unseemly glory.
Now,
the immediate question is this: How will ASEAN treat the South China
Sea disputes and the other issues at the ASEAN, the ASEAN+3, the three
ASEAN+1, the ASEAN-India, the ASEAN-US, the ASEAN-UN, and the
eighteen-country East Asia Summits in November 2012 under Cambodian
Prime Minister Hun Sen’s chairmanship?
In any case,
sooner or later, ASEAN may work out formulations on the South China Sea
disputes and other issues that are acceptable to everyone, as it has
done in the past. ASEAN has faced contentious issues before; indeed, it
has been able to negotiate and reach compromises on many such issues
–Vietnam’s incursion into and military occupation of Cambodia in the
1980s, the political settlement of the Vietnam-Cambodia issue in 1991,
the problem of Indochinese asylum-seekers, the 1993 statement on human
rights, the internal political issues in Cambodia in July 1997, the
problem of Myanmar, the nuclear weapons on the Korean peninsula.
Now,
the question is: Is the South China Sea and other contemporary issues
more or less difficult and complex than those of the past?
The
important thing is to allow ASEAN the autonomy, independence and
capacity that it needs to arrive at common positions that are in the
interest of the individual ASEAN members, of Southeast Asia, and of the
Asia-Pacific as a whole. This ability was the aim of ASEAN’s founding in
the first place.
Such joint communiquès are important. They record what was discussed. -- GMA News
1 comment:
plz read, chinese history for S. china sea.. (google.com)
can not be blamed on Cambodian as Chair.. ASEAN
Post a Comment