A Change of Guard

សូមស្តាប់វិទ្យុសង្គ្រោះជាតិ Please read more Khmer news and listen to CNRP Radio at National Rescue Party. សូមស្តាប់វីទ្យុខ្មែរប៉ុស្តិ៍/Khmer Post Radio.
Follow Khmerization on Facebook/តាមដានខ្មែរូបនីយកម្មតាម Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/khmerization.khmerican

Saturday 9 June 2012

Strongman of Cambodia [The strongest among the weakest]

June 8th 2012, 
The Economist
By L.H. | PHNOM PENH
THE prime minister has no shortage of critics hoping for his demise. Brad Adams of Human Rights Watch (HRW), a New York-based NGO, recently compared Hun Sen with the series of notorious autocrats recently ousted from power in the Arab world. Ben Ali, Mubarak, Qaddafi: men who ruled by threat and force.
His sentiments were backed loudly by one of Cambodia’s long-serving opposition leaders, Sam Rainsy. He insists from self-imposed exile that his country is primed for an Arab spring and reckons he’s the man to lead it. (The Cambodian government regards him as a fugitive, having convicted him on charges of spreading false information.)
Their problem is that Hun Sen, who according to Mr Adams’s calculations is one of the world’s top-ten longest-serving political leaders, keeps on winning elections—as he did again, just this week.

In regional terms Cambodia’s commune elections are a minor affair. The country has 1,633 communes, or clusters of villagers, which choose their local leaders once every five years. Their main value for outsiders is in offering rare insight into the prime minister’s popularity and that of his Cambodian People’s Party (CPP).
The CPP already held an overwhelming majority of communes, which reflects the enormous support it enjoys among Cambodia’s predominantly rural voters. The ruling party went into the polls with control of 1,592 of the communes. It appears set to match that and also to increase its majorities within the communes. At last count it had won 11,459 seats, which is about 200 more than they took at the previous poll, five years ago.
Nine other parties contested the CPP in Sunday’s poll. More than 15,000 national and international observers were tasked with keeping watch for voter fraud, intimidation and other “irregularities”.
The complaints the observers heard were not insignificant. They included charges that the government used the police and army to help it campaign; that the opposition’s access to the media was limited; and that radio stations were instructed by the information ministry not to carry certain stories. Influential CPP officials were seen at polling booths, where they are alleged to have tried intimidating voters into supporting their candidates.
But even this hardly compared with the spate of election-related murders and bullying that plagued voting in the 1990s and early 2000s At least 20 deaths were blamed on the violence that marked the first commune polls, in 2002.
An independent watchdog organisation, Comfrel, said this election marked an improvement on previous polls. There were, at least, fewer instances of violence, intimidation and the rest.
The biggest change in this poll was a sharp drop in the rate of participation. It may have been low as 54%, compared with the 87% rate recorded 10 years ago, or the 84% seen at the general elections of 1993—when 380 people were killed in the attendant violence.
Critics contend that fewer people voted because there is widespread disenchantment with the incumbent as well as a sense of inevitability about the outcome. That may be, but it’s worth noting that only the opposition parties suffered a fall in votes.
The most obvious outcome was that the Sam Rainsy Party (SRP) lost ground in their traditional strongholds, like Phnom Penh, the capital, after failing to capitalise on the perennial issues that plague Cambodia.
Corruption, a culture of impunity among the politically connected and violent land-grabs have sullied the government’s reputation. This was underscored by the recent killing of a prominent environmentalist, Chhut Vuthy, and the jailing of 13 women who had become visible for their protests against land-grabs in the capital.
What many of Hun Sen’s critics fail to understand, particularly those who would hope to inspire an Arab-spring-like uprising, is that Cambodians remember very well what a dreadful business civil war can be. In 1998 Hun Sen achieved where UN promises had failed and ended 30 years of a conflict that had left millions dead.
For that reason many Cambodians are still prepared to overlook the bloody indiscretions and brutal tactics of the ruling party—and willing to carry Hun Sen to repeated victories. The chances of fermenting a Khmer spring are remote, and might seem plausible only to a self-imposed exile abroad.
(Picture credit: Wikimedia Commons)

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

Khmers must stop attacking each other and must stop hatred on each other...Khmers lost Lands from EAST and WEST, because of hatred and attacking each other, for me I don't care who is still running the country...As long As cambodian continue their prosperity and become modernise country everyday>>>economy, jobs, people living with better life everyday! Thats all I care!! I knew some of you don't agree with me, but I speak the truth from the bottom of my heart...Remembered nothing solve overnight, our govts trying so hard step by step to have our country in better shap as you all have seen today!!!

Anonymous said...

Me2, i don't really care who is running the country as long as he/ she abide by the rules of laws of the country,working for people not for people of interest.I personally, did not hate hunsen,but i did hated his policy favorited one groups of people denied anothers...

I am very straight forward kind of guy,i see its black,i say it is back,i respect the rule of laws.If i disagree with the my critic,i still respect him/ her without using profanity to get my point across.

I wish all our khmers people work together as one goal, which is to build better Cambodia for our future generation,our land getting smaller everyday,our people kept on fighting each other like dogs and cats,too sad to see all of these happened before our eyes.

Hunsen,got a power to stop land grabbing that destroyed khmers likelihood,but hunsen turned his blinded eyes on them, so did the KING!...

Young k.professional

Anonymous said...

Hunsen is not strong without Yuon behind him.Hunsen is strong among the weaks,he is weaks among Yuon,Hunsen has admitted himself that he is only "scared of his father citizens and His wife Bunrany "Who are his father's citizens that made a strongman like Husen's scared!!!?

I hope ain't Hanoi.....That he called father citizens....Yuon!!!!!!?????

Anonymous said...

Look at this way guys... Why former King Sihanouk stick with China's policy not United State?...There's must be something that China could help cambodian rebuilding her country, we do need something to hold on, because we are the poorest country and weakness country...Cambodia can't do it alone by Itself! Making friend with our neighbor and rebuild our strength is the good step forward>...SIAM(THAI)did that in the past "history" when they asking Great khmer king for permission to allow their small tribe to stay...I don't mind who running the cuntry right now, just want to see my cambodian improve everday with strong economy, jobs, for all our people throughout the kingdom!

Anonymous said...

Hon Xen is children beater, disable and hopeless people beater

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

To the gentle men and soft ladies wh do not care who is running the company called Cambodia

Why you cannot see the truth?

1. No rule of law because the laws are applied to the poor and the weak but the rich and the powerful are above the laws;A French philosopher said, "All people are equal because laws allow both the poor and the rich to live under the bridge and to beg for breads".
2. The poor and the weak are living in constant fear because they are abused by police,military police (see the video clip), the rich and the thugs;
3. No economic development because your govt keeps borrowing billions of dollars from the world; who will re-pay that?
4. You don't have social welfare policy to take care of the poor and the old (read Koksantipeap about the old begging for help everyday);
5. You don't talk about and enforce immigration law, Yuon can come and go very easily;
6. Natural resources are depleted day by day...etc,

So, it does not matter who leads the country, but the guy who cannot solve these problems should not be the leader.

Kakada

Anonymous said...

ហ៊ុន សែន​ ខ្សោយប៉ុន្តែឈ្នៈលើអ្នកខ្លាំង
នេះជាការពិត