By Molly Bergen
Later this month at Rio+20,
world leaders will gather to discuss the future of our planet — a
future that must account for the value of nature in order to achieve
truly sustainable economic growth. In his new book, “The Cardamom Conundrum: Reconciling Development and Conservation in the Kingdom of Cambodia,” scientist Dr. Tim Killeen provides
an insightful new look at sustainable development opportunities in this
resource-rich but poverty-stricken country. He recently took time to
discuss his research with me.
Q: What is the “Cardamom conundrum”?
A: The term “conundrum” describes a puzzle whose solution involves resolving a paradox. In Cambodia’s
case, the paradox arises from two widely held and conflicting
assumptions: that the pathway to a modern economy requires exploiting a
country’s natural resources, versus the contrasting vision that the
long-term prosperity of a nation depends on the conservation of those
very same resources.
In the book, I attempt to show that the best economic options are
also in line with priorities in the environmental and social dimensions.
Development options that promote investment in a productive asset are
good business, and applying that logic to the natural assets of a
country or region also makes good business sense.
Q: Why is this region of Cambodia so important?
A: The Cardamom Mountains
and surrounding regions — what I call the “Greater Cardamom Region” —
makes up about one-third of Cambodia’s land area and has a combined
population of more than a million people. The region’s watersheds extend
to the Tonle Sap Lake in the north and the Gulf of Thailand in the south and provide freshwater resources of strategic importance to the country.
For example, the ongoing development of hydropower facilities in the
region will provide Cambodia with affordable energy that is key to
economic growth and development of the entire nation. More importantly,
the region is a microcosm of the nation; the development strategies that
make sense for the Cardamoms also make sense for the country as a
whole.
Q: What was the focus of your research?
A: I focused on the potential “win-wins” that
sustainable development can bring to economic decision-making. For
example, most of Cambodia’s farmland lies dormant during the long dry
season, but drip irrigation that exploits the subterranean aquifer of
the Tonle Sap and Mekong River could revolutionize the livelihoods of
the nation’s small farmers. Since the aquifer is replenished each year
by the annual floods, this agricultural intensification strategy would
be completely sustainable.
Likewise, investments in aquaculture
could alleviate the stress to the nation’s natural fisheries —
assuming, of course, that aquaculture is also practiced sustainably and
protects surrounding freshwater and estuarine resources.
A: The annual monsoon is a very stable climatic
phenomenon, and this is good news for the region. However, some models
show the monsoon will increase in intensity, with greater rainfall in
the wet season and a more severe dry season. Climate change
may also lead to an increase in the periodic droughts that are
associated with the El Ñino phenomenon of the Pacific Ocean. That will
increase the risk to farmers and the ability of hydropower facilities to
meet energy demand.
Q: What were some of the major findings of your research?
A: Cambodia can build a green economy by focusing on four pillars of its existing and future economy:
- Conserving and managing forests by emphasizing community forestry (which can be subsidized by international carbon markets).
- Diversifying agriculture by intensifying production on the rice plain through drip irrigation, but also by introducing new crops on upland landscapes, particularly perennial woody species such as rubber and silk.
- Ensuring the productivity of the country’s existing natural fisheries, while using technology to promote innovation and sustainability in aquaculture.
- Promoting the concepts of sustainable tourism by improving land-use planning and zoning, energy efficiency and design in tourist facilities.
Q: Did any of these findings surprise you?
A: Not really … most of these concepts and ideas
have been promoted for years by the development community. What has
changed is the realization that climate change and a globalized economy
dictate that business models embrace the concepts of sustainability.
Cambodia has the opportunity to be a leader in developing a green
economy — in part, because the country doesn’t have the legacy of a
fossil fuel dependent economy, but also because by embracing the
concepts of sustainability, the goods and services they produce will be
more competitive in global markets that are increasingly demanding
sustainable products.
Q: How much research went into this book?
A: I am not a Cambodian expert, and have spent most
of my career working on environmental and development issues in the
Amazon. CI sent me to Cambodia in 2008 to help our program understand
development issues, particularly those related to hydropower
infrastructure and regional integration.
The book grew out of that experience, and reflects the information
and knowledge produced by hundreds of researchers and development
experts who have been working in Cambodia over the past two decades. It
is much more a compilation and synthesis of information, rather than
original research.
Q: What will be the outcome of this research? What should the next steps be?
A: The book has been translated into Khmer, and we
hope that it will be read by Cambodia’s decision-makers. We are
confident that it will be a “must read” book that will impact the youth
of Cambodia. The book conveys a positive message, and we hope that
message will influence the national debate on Cambodia’s future.
Tim Killeen is the senior technical advisor for global change and ecosystem services in CI’s Science and Knowledge division.
image: Tim Killeen inspecting timber beams confiscated by forest
rangers and military police near the Central Cardamom Protected Forest
in 2008. (Photo courtesy of Tim Killeen)
No comments:
Post a Comment