Cambodia Can Benefit From Lessons Learned From Myanmar Vote: Analysts
rfa 2015-11-12
![]() |
| Cambodian officials from the National Election Committee open security packages containing ballot records from Siem Reap province at the body's headquarters in Phnom Penh, Aug. 30, 2013. |
Myanmar’s
historic general elections in which Aung San Suu Kyi’s opposition party
has come out on top offer valuable lessons for Cambodia, a
quasi-democracy that has been ruled by a strongman prime minister for
three decades, Cambodian political analysts said.
The
observers said Cambodia should look to the results of Myanmar’s Nov. 8
election, in which the National League of Democracy (NLD) party has won a
majority of seats in the lower house of parliament, as a possible
outcome for its own general elections in July 2018.
Kem
Ley, an independent social development researcher, said the NLD’s
success showed Myanmar’s ruling military-backed Union Solidarity and
Development Party (USDP) the reality that voters have been unhappy with
its leadership.
The
elections and results are significant for Cambodians who hunger for
change to think about their future even more than before, he said.
Cambodia’s
leader Hun Sen, a former Khmer Rouge soldier, plans to run for a fifth
term as prime minister, in the country’s next general elections.
Myanmar’s
elections have provided valuable lessons for the opposition Cambodia
National Rescue Party (CNRP) as well as for other opposition parties in
the region, Kem Ley said.
“The struggle for democracy takes a lot of patience and a long time, and [we] must have constantly peaceful means,” he said.
Kem
Ley, however, did not go so far as to speculate that the CNRP would win
the elections, despite its widespread support among the people.
The
NLD has sacrificed more than the CNPR has in Cambodia, he said, which
resulted in voters trusting Aung San Suu Kyi as leader of the political
opposition.
“Aung
San Suu Kyi and the important [NLD] figures and activists have never
fled their country, and for the most part they have stayed connected
with their supporters in the country,” he said.
Ou
Virak, president of the Future Forum organization and an observer of
political developments in Cambodia, said the momentum of the NLD would
inspire and motivate opposition party voters in Cambodia to continue
making an effort to change their society.
Like
Kem Ley, he said it would be difficult to foresee whether the CNRP
might have the same success as the NLD because since Cambodia’s next
election is more than two and a half years away.
“The
political situation in Myanmar is as tense as it is in Cambodia, and
actually even tenser,” he said. “The people of Myanmar, despite [an
atmosphere of] fear, remained brave and courageous enough to rush to
vote in very large numbers in a very daring manner in order to change
the government. And I would like to offer my warm support and
encouragement for the Cambodian people to do the same."
Pol
Ham, acting president of the CNRP, welcomed the election results in
Myanmar and said the takeaway for Cambodia was to implement a democratic
process through elections.
“This
election will change the history of Myanmar,” he said. “We want to see
other countries, especially Cambodia, implementing democratic practices
appropriately. Whatever party wins, [we would like to see] a peaceful
transfer of power here as in Myanmar.”
‘Like the sky and the earth’
Sok
Eysan, spokesman for the ruling Cambodian People’s Party (CPP),
however, said the results of Myanmar’s elections would not have any
influence on Cambodia.
He
said Aung San Suu Kyi has come out on top in the Myanmar elections
because she has the real interest of the country at heart, while CNRP
leader Sam Rainsy was merely a “nationalist.”
“There
is no way of linking the situation of Myanmar to that of Cambodia,” he
said. “The opposition party in Cambodia is not so excited as to dream or
speculate that it will win the elections in 2018 as Myanmar’s
opposition party has done.”
“The
situations [in Cambodia and Myanmar] are different, and the criteria
and qualifications of the two countries are way different just like the
sky and the earth,” he said
Cambodia’s
last elections in July 2013 were marred by allegations of widespread
irregularities after the government-appointed National Election
Committee (NEC) declared Hun Sen’s CPP the winner.
The
results sparked several major demonstrations by CNRP against the
government, calling for the prime minister’s resignation and new
elections. The CNRP also boycotted parliament for a year.
Authorities
responded to the rallies with violence in some cases, including a
crackdown on CNRP-backed striking garment workers in January 2014 which
left five dead after security personnel opened fire on the
demonstration.
No balloting irregularities
Koul
Panha, executive director of the Committee for Free and Fair Elections
in Cambodia (Comfrel), who has been in Myanmar since Nov. 3 to observe
the general elections, said Wednesday that he did not detect any
balloting irregularities as had occurred in Cambodia’s general elections
in 2013.
“The
results of the elections were not much different from the results
claimed by both parties, and the political parties had strong managers,
while the results of the elections were collected by party officials in a
more free and fair manner,” he said.
Election
committees in each area and regional polling stations issued the voting
results so that the political parties could obtain them quickly, he
said.
“That
is why Aung San Suu Kyi’s party was able to broadcast and distribute
the unofficial results of the elections right away, even faster than the
media and the Union Election Commission could,” Koul Panha said.
Aung
San Suu Kyi told RFA’s Myanmar service on Thursday, however, that the
NLD would file complaints about irregularities in advance ballots in
several areas, among other problems.
Voting
results from rural areas of Myanmar were slower because of a lack of
technology and a polling system that was similar to that of Cambodia, he
said.
There
were neither any violence during the Myanmar elections nor any military
movements, and the polls were well managed, he said.
“The
polling places were safe because they reflected the way the process was
organized and the election monitoring by observers,” Koul Panha said,
adding that most of the volunteers who served as organizers were female
teachers.
Reported
by Yang Chandara and Morm Moniroth for RFA’s Khmer Service. Translated
by Pagnawath Khun. Written in English by Roseanne Gerin.

No comments:
Post a Comment