By Sebastian Strangio
Asia Times Online
PHNOM PENH - The official theme for
Cambodia's chairmanship of the Association of
Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) is "One Community,
One Destiny" - but the outcomes of this year's
meetings highlighted the bloc's growing divisions
on the issue of China.
Last week in the
Cambodian capital, the Foreign Ministers' meeting
came to an acrimonious end when delegates from the
10-member bloc failed to issue their customary
joint communique - the first time they have failed
to do so in ASEAN's 45-year history - after
disagreements over the territorial disputes in the
South China Sea.
China claims sovereignty
over most of the resource-rich sea, but four ASEAN
nations - the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia and Brunei - have advanced
competing claims. Last week's meetings were
overshadowed by a flare-up over a group of islands
known as the Scarborough Shoal, a fish-rich reef
claimed by both China and the Philippines. The two
countries had a military stand-off over the shoal
earlier this year, sending ships to the area.
During ASEAN talks on the creation of a
Code of Conduct, which would govern the behavior
of ships in the disputed maritime areas, Manila
tried to insert reference to the Scarborough
Shoal, but claims it was blocked by Cambodia - a
close ally of China. ASEAN Secretary General Surin
Pitsuwan called the meeting's outcome "very
disappointing", while Indonesian Foreign Minister
Marty Natalegawa said it was "utterly
irresponsible" that the grouping could not come up
with a joint statement on the South China Sea
dispute.
Cambodian Foreign Minister Hor
Namhong blamed unnamed "member countries" for
trying to forcibly include a mention of the
Scarborough Shoal issue in the final communique.
He called these requests "unacceptable", and laid
the blame for the breakdown on "the whole of
ASEAN".
In response, the Philippines said
in a statement that "it deplore[d] the
non-issuance of a joint communique" and took
"strong exception" to Cambodia's actions, arguing
that they undermined previous agreements to tackle
the South China Sea disputes as a unified bloc -
rather than bilaterally, as China would prefer.
Philippine Foreign Secretary Albert del Rosario
told Bloomberg that the impasse was a result of
Chinese "pressure, duplicity [and] intimidation".
Similar tensions were also apparent at the
annual ASEAN Summit in April, when Cambodia kept
the South China Sea dispute off the official
agenda. Some analysts suggested that Chinese
President Hu Jintao, who arrived on a high-profile
state visit just days before the opening of the
summit, had pressured Phnom Penh over the issue.
The recent tensions highlight just how far
Chinese influence has increased in Cambodia in
recent years. Beijing's offers of hefty amounts of
loans and investment dollars unconstrained by
human-rights or good governance concerns has been
eagerly taken up by Cambodian Prime Minister Hun
Sen, who resents the conditions often attached to
Western aid.
Chinese state banks today
bankroll the construction of roads, bridges,
hydropower dams, real estate developments and
tourist resorts in Cambodia. Over the past decade,
these loans and grants have run into the billions
of US dollars, and official delegations shuttle
back and forth between the two countries each
year.
Monetary
attachment
Despite Hun Sen's claims that
China's support is offered without strings,
Beijing's economic clout has bought the country
considerable political leverage in Cambodia. This
was dramatically demonstrated in December 2009
when Cambodia deported 20 ethnic Uyghur asylum
seekers to China. The timing of the deportation -
a day before the arrival of a Chinese official
carrying a $1.2 billion package of grants and loan
agreements - left few in doubt that extreme
pressure was brought to bear on Phnom Penh.
This unspoken quid pro quo arrangement
extends back as far as July 1997, when Hun Sen
ousted his rival, Prince Norodom Ranariddh, in a
bloody factional coup. Unlike many Western
countries, which balked at the bloodshed in Phnom
Penh, China immediately recognized the status quo
and offered military aid. Hun Sen reciprocated by
shuttering the Taiwanese representative's office
in Phnom Penh after accusing Taiwanese elements of
providing support to his rivals, and in the years
since has frequently voiced support for the
One-China policy.
"I think it's very
difficult to deny there are no strings attached to
Chinese aid and economic assistance in Cambodia,"
said Lao Mong Hay, an independent political
analyst based in Phnom Penh. "The attitude and
position taken by Cambodia at the last [ASEAN]
meeting shows that it was toeing the Chinese
line."
ASEAN, a regional grouping built on
the premise of safeguarding Southeast Asian
interests from outside pressure or interference,
now faces an uncertain year.
Analysts say
the disappointing end to last week's foreign
ministers' meeting could undermine ASEAN unity on
the vital South China Sea issue, making it that
much more difficult to negotiate a Code of Conduct
with China.
"Cambodia's single act of
obstinacy is a reflection of China's influence and
not Cambodian interests," said Carlyle Thayer, an
analyst at the Australian Defence Force Academy in
Sydney, adding that it would likely "poison" ASEAN
proceedings until the next round of summits in
November.
However, the dispute could
potentially have deeper implications for ASEAN,
cracking its unity and exacerbating the
differences between the grouping's widely diverse
member states.
The bloc was founded in
1967 as a bulwark against the expansion of
communism in Southeast Asia, with Indonesia,
Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore and Thailand
as members. During the 1970s and '80s it played a
strong role in the US-led isolation of communist
Vietnam, and, after 1979, the Cambodian government
installed by Hanoi after the overthrow of the
murderous regime led by the Khmer Rouge. The end
of the Cold War brought an end to the overt
anti-communist posture of ASEAN, which was
eventually expanded to include Vietnam (1995),
Laos and Myanmar (1997), and Cambodia (1999).
But tensions have remained between the old
and new members. In 2007, Singapore's founding
father, Lee Kuan Yew, identified a division
between ASEAN's original member states and the
poorer nations that joined in the 1990s. According
to a leaked cable from the US Embassy in
Singapore, Lee told US officials that ASEAN should
not have admitted Cambodia, Myanmar, Laos and
Vietnam as members, fearful that some might act as
a pro-Chinese fifth column within ASEAN.
"The older members of ASEAN shared common
values and an antipathy to communism," the cable
states, quoting Lee's views. "Those values had
been 'muddied' by the new members, and their
economic and social problems made it doubtful they
would ever behave like the older ASEAN members."
Lee particularly focused on Laos,
describing it as an "outpost" of China that
reported back to Beijing on the content of all
ASEAN meetings - but he could easily have
mentioned Cambodia, which is quickly becoming
China's most dependable ally in the region.
Thayer said last week's imbroglio, after
years of pro-unity rhetoric, was "the first major
breach of the dyke of regional autonomy" created
by ASEAN. "China has now reached into ASEAN's
inner sanctum and played on intra-ASEAN
divisions," he said.
In the worst-case
scenario, he added, continuing disagreement could
undermine the creation of the planned ASEAN
Political-Security Community and potentially raise
the specter of a de facto division between the
mainland Southeast Asian states - Vietnam, Laos,
Cambodia, Thailand and Myanmar - and ASEAN's
maritime states. "I don't know how this rift is
going to be overcome," he said.
It is too
soon to say whether last week's stand-off will
sound the death knell for ASEAN's "One Community"
pledge. Lao Mong Hay, for one, believes there are
"serious leaders [in ASEAN] who will set out to
repair the damage". But it is quickly becoming
apparent that Phnom Penh's dependence on Chinese
loans and grants is a development with regional
implications.
Sebastian Strangio
is a journalist based in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. He
may be reached at sebastian.strangio@gmail.com
1 comment:
Don't blame the paw leader, because our behavior are also like the paw.
Just a natural life, that a cleaver paw leads the whole dump paws.
Post a Comment