A Change of Guard

សូមស្តាប់វិទ្យុសង្គ្រោះជាតិ Please read more Khmer news and listen to CNRP Radio at National Rescue Party. សូមស្តាប់វីទ្យុខ្មែរប៉ុស្តិ៍/Khmer Post Radio.
Follow Khmerization on Facebook/តាមដានខ្មែរូបនីយកម្មតាម Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/khmerization.khmerican

Sunday, 13 May 2012

Cooperation needed before and after ruling [Thailand wants cooperation with Cambodia if it lost the Preah Vihear case, but no cooperation if it won]

13th May, 2012
Bangkok Post

By convening a meeting on Thursday with Foreign Ministry officials and a legal team representing the Thai side of the dispute with Cambodia over land adjacent to the Preah Vihear temple, Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra sent a clear message that despite improved relations between countries she is determined to protect Thailand's sovereignty. In the meeting the prime minister told the legal team, which included Thai ambassador to the Hague, Virachai Plasai, and lawyers from France, Canada and Australia, to prepare to oppose Cambodia's request that the International Court of Justice (ICJ) interpret its 1962 verdict, which awarded the the temple to Cambodia, but made no mention of the 4.6 square kilometre area which is claimed by both countries. The meeting was called ahead of the June 21 deadline by which Thailand has to submit written observations on Cambodia's petition to the ICJ to interpret the 1962 verdict. No date has yet been set for the ICJ's final ruling.
The prime minister's actions are to be expected from any national leader, and they make good political sense. The issue which nearly escalated into open warfare in early 2011 and resulted in the deaths of 17 soldiers and a civilian is thankfully much less heated now, but it is still highly politically charged and there are people waiting in the wings to accuse her of being weak in the defence of national sovereignty if any opening should be presented.
It is not only ''ultra-nationalist'' yellow shirts who would condemn acquiescing without a fight in the territorial dispute, but also ordinary Thais. The Thai side has a good argument to make for gaining control of the 4.6 sq km disputed area and every effort should be made to prepare the best case possible to take before the ICJ.
That said, when the ICJ does finally deliver its verdict, which is now expected toward the end of 2013, both sides should abide by it and at long last lay the issue to rest. But this may be wishful thinking considering the level of compliance on both sides with the ICJ's provisional rulings of July 18 last year. The ICJ ruled that the the two countries must withdraw their troops from a 17.3 sq km zone which includes the Preah Vihear temple and the 4.6 sq km disputed area. The ICJ also asked Indonesian observers to monitor the withdrawal process.
Initially both Thailand and Cambodia agreed to the withdrawal, but time dragged on without any movement, and at an Asean summit in Phnom Penh early last month it was quickly and without any fanfare agreed that the troops would stay where they are. Needless to say, there is also little likelihood of Indonesian observers at this point. The willingness from both sides to ignore the ICJ's provisional rulings, which were designed to diminish the possibility of armed confrontation, is discouraging and unwise. True, tensions have eased significantly since the change of government in Thailand in July of last year, but it should not be taken for granted that violence will not erupt again as long as there are troops from both nations stationed so near to each other.
The inherent danger of this situation was highlighted late last month with reports of an exchange of gunfire between soldiers on the border. A Cambodian military official said his troops were attacked by Thai forces. The next day Thai army spokesman Col Sansern Kaewkamnerd denied there was a clash between troops. What really happened, said Col Sansern, was that Thai troops on patrol encountered a group of Cambodian log poachers on Thai soil and fired warning shots into the air, causing the poachers to flee. In an apparently separate incident Thai troops came upon another group of log poachers and there was an exchange of gunfire lasting 10 minutes. It remains unclear if Cambodian troops were involved in either incident.
It is clear that there is illegal logging going on in the area, and this is an area where bilateral cooperation is needed. Another such area is in clearing landmines laid by both countries, both during the recent conflict and during the time of the Khmer Rouge. When Thailand and Cambodia agreed in early April to disregard the ICJ's directive for a mutual troop withdrawal, they also agreed to joint mine-clearing operations along the border. The incident two weeks ago in which two Thai soldiers were seriously injured by landmines near the Preah Vihear temple provided a stark reminder that this needs to be made a top priority.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

may be the ICJ reverts back all the khmer land and make all the tai go back to china's Nan chao or modern Yunan. Thailand is khmer deep down, the cultures, the customs ,the people. there is no such things as thai cultures in Yunan in the past or today. The people are native khmer but been indoctrinated and speak siam. people will only identify themselve as khmer when Cambodia is rich and powerful. Sovannaphum is still the name we call this land, regardless whether you are Khmer, thai or laotian. the land is khmer, it always was and it always will be. May be we will all speak thai, in one hundred years from now....again nobody speak Latin today but there is a city call Rome.the khmer legacy will live on forever. Khmer is Southeast Asia and Southeast Asia is Khmer land.

Anonymous said...

11:24 idiot you are talking like the Thai is well trained like European or American forces. These lady boys try for 3 years to gain 4.6 Sq Km idiot and our boys killed them all over those mountain positions.

Don't look down on us Khmers and we will still be here for millionion until we kick your ass back to Yunan, China. You ungrateful guests.

We had fought US and Viets and we still here asshole. We don't want war but if you want a taste we will be happy to give you one asshole.

Khmer Army is small compare to those lady boys but what those weapons will do for you when we chasing you to eat your livers asshole.

Anonymous said...

No one in the world will support Thailand aggressor especially Britain.
Thai is a land changing its name from Siam to Thai by a war crime dictator loser Phibun Songkrak who escaped to Japan and died under the Japan's Kimono. He left behind him millions ignorant Thai people always think Hitler as a Thai Hero. Italians killed Benitao Mussolini for his war crime but Thai made a dictator loser Phibun Songkram as their Hero. Thai people today are the children of a war crime dictator loser Phibun losing WWII

Anonymous said...

Oh! Come on my fellows, you let your emotion
get the best of you in here!...Siam is cowardly race they can only shoot un-arm people (khmers) little kids chasing rabit in 1979 border shoot out they run like a coward,two days later they come back with tanks by then a little kids[K.R soldiers] withdrew back took their all their food supplies to the camp.

You see these siamee soldiers were cowardly then,they still be cowardly now,nothing is changed,on Dorng Rech lately they run like a coward to ask for more back up,they can't fight like a real soldiers .

So my fellows,for the sake of talking in here if the Icj reward Siam khmers land and Preah Vihea,the Icj is asking for WAR. I believe the Icj knows better not to stir up old hatred or picking on an old wounded.

I am personally will be fighting along side my fellows khmers if it war broke out causes by this conflicts of aggressiveness of the thieves(Siam).
Just wait and see how this conflicts play out by ICJ...
Y.k.pro