A Change of Guard

សូមស្តាប់វិទ្យុសង្គ្រោះជាតិ Please read more Khmer news and listen to CNRP Radio at National Rescue Party. សូមស្តាប់វីទ្យុខ្មែរប៉ុស្តិ៍/Khmer Post Radio.
Follow Khmerization on Facebook/តាមដានខ្មែរូបនីយកម្មតាម Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/khmerization.khmerican

Wednesday 18 April 2012

Exit of ANZ Royal CEO unexplained

Kith Meng, chairman of Royal Group, which is part-owner of ANZ Royal Bank.

By Don Weinland
Wednesday, 18 April 2012
Phnom Penh Post

ANZ Royal Bank chief executive Damian Bell has resigned from the post he held for not much more than a month, a company spokeswoman confirmed yesterday.

He resigned “several weeks ago”, Libby Armstrong, a Hong Kong-based ANZ spokeswoman, said by phone.

No explanation was offered for the unannounced end to Bell’s multiweek tenure.

Bell took the position in February after serving as CEO for ANZ Laos, replacing former ANZ Royal head Stephen Higgins.

Higgins had run the bank since 2008.

At the time, Higgins said the leadership change was routine.

“It’s part of a regular cycle of CEOs,” he told the Post, noting that regional positions often lasted three to four years.

ANZ Royal is a joint venture between Cambodia’s Royal Group of Companies and the Australia and New Zealand Banking Group, with ANZ controlling a 55 per cent majority stake.

A new CEO has yet to be appointed, but ANZ deputy CEO for Asia Pacific, Europe and America Alistair Bulloch is standing in during the interim, according to the spokeswoman.

“We will hopefully announce the appointment of someone to the position soon,” Armstrong said.

The spokeswoman and other ANZ Royal officials declined to say why Bell resigned after such a brief stint in the position.

When contacted yesterday, Royal Group chairman Kith Meng said the move was “part of our company strategy”, before saying he was in a meeting and hanging up.

Bell could not be reached yesterday for comment.
To contact the reporter on this story: Don Weinland at don.weinland@phnompenhpost.com

1 comment:

Marc said...

".....part of our company strategy". How can a business believe that having a CEO for 1 month is part of company strategy. Quite a stupid approach to people-management in the 21st Century.