"Temu", the Funan's capital, was estimated to be 500 li from Funan's seaport, according the Chinese envoys.
Oc Eo (Khmer, Keo river), believed by some as the seaport of the Funan (2nd-7th century); but Oc Eo was not situated directly at the coast of the bay of Rach Gia province, there was at no time a port by which the Chinese envoys could enter the Funan polity. Additionally, no records mentioning a port at Rach Gia during or after Funan. But Peam Meas (from which "Meithor" derives) is known as a khmer port. Peam means "mouth" of a river or a lake, it also means "(water) port". (Thai, "Pa(k)" came from Khmer "Peam", Pac-nam mouth of the river) Peam Ro, for instance, in Prey Veng, was an ancient port of Ba Phnom. Peam Meas might have been the Funan's seaport the Chinese envoys mentioned. From Peam Meas, the Chinese envoys could (via the Mekong) enter the Ba Phnom's port of Peam Ro.
Now, the distance of 500 li or 200 km from the sea to the capital of Funan, as estimated by the Chinese envoys recorded in 6th century cannot be seen from Oc Eo site. And it could not have been Angkor Borei, Takeo, as Angkor Borei was/is only about 85 km from O Keo/Oc Eo, and shorter in distance from Peam Meas/Meithor. Ba Phnom, Prey Veng, loosely fits the distance description by the Chinese envoys. Archaeological finds/riches at Prohear village, and Bit Meas, in Prey Veng, supports the description that Prey Veng's Ba Phnom might have been the capital of Funan, the Rich South.
Professor Miriam Starks will convince us that it's the Angkor Borei site was the Funan's capital. This will be interesting.
See you tonight at the University of Sydney, people.
Regards
Touch Bora
---------------------------------------------
The lecture is free just turn up. Thank you for RSVPing.
Cheers,
Martin
___________________________________
Martin P. King PhD
Angkor Research Program
Digital Innovation Unit for the Humanities and Social Sciences
Room 314 Madsen Building F09
University of Sydney
NSW 2006
Australia
Phone: +61-2-9351-7667
Fax: +61-2-9351-3644
E-mail: martin.king@sydney.edu.au
http://sydney.edu.au/angkor/
http://sydney.edu.au/arts/digitalinnovation/
S.T. Lee Annual Lecture in Asian Art and Archaeology 2010
The Lee Annual Lecture in Asian Art and Archaeology will be held in the Refectory of the Main Quadrangle of the University of Sydney from 6pm Wednesday 11th August 2010. This years lecture will be given by Professor Miriam Stark, Archaeologist, University of Hawai’i-Manoa, United States of America.
The Mekong Delta Before Angkor: origins, landscapes and emergent complexity
The earliest states in mainland Southeast Asia emerged between 500 BCE and 500 CE, a period known as the Axial Age. In the West, this time encompassed Hellenistic Greece, the rise of the Roman Empire, and the birth of Christianity. Viewed from the East, the period included imperial expansion by the Han dynasty, the rise of the earliest Korean and Japanese kingdoms, the spread of Buddhism across the Asian continent, and rise of competing empires during the golden age of South Asia. Southeast Asians also embraced this Axial Age, although few historians or archaeologists have studied the period until recently. During this time Southeast Asians established a South China Sea maritime trade network and built large settlements along the region’s coasts and inland deltas. They adopted writing systems and religious ideology from South Asia, and created Indic-tinged templates for statecraft whose signatures shaped the emergence and operation of Southeast Asias classical states like Angkor, Sukothai, and Pagan nearly a thousand years later.
Professor Miriam Stark has worked in collaboration with CambodiaR17;s Ministry of Culture and Fine Arts since 1996 on the archaeology of the Mekong Delta. This region was politically central during the Axial Age, and work by her Lower Mekong Archaeological Project began with research at the archaeological site of Angkor Borei (Takeo province). Most scholars consider that this 300 ha walled site was a Funan capital that the Chinese annals described during the early to mid-first millennium CE. The region remained prominent in the following pre-Angkorian period, and research described in this lecture examines archaeological research by the Lower Mekong Archaeological Project on landscapes and emergent complexity.
Date: Wednesday 11th August 2010
Time: 6 - 8pm
Location: Refectory of the Main Quadrangle of the University of Sydney (http://www2.arts.usyd.edu.au/ArtsNetwork/docs/main_quad_instr.pdf)
RSVP: Monday 9th August 2010 (Martin King - 9351-7667 or martin.king@sydney.edu.au)
Miriam Stark was awarded a PhD from the University of Arizona in 1993, and has worked in Southeast Asian archaeology since 1987. With extensive field experience in North America (particularly the North American Southwest), she studied tribal potters in the northern Philippines for her doctoral research. She worked with the Thailand Archaeometallurgical project in central Thailand in the early 1990s, and after accepting a position at the University of Hawaii-Manoa -- began her archaeological studies in Cambodia. Through the Lower Mekong Archaeological Project and in collaboration with CambodiaR17;s Ministry of Culture and Fine Arts, Miriam has worked in the Mekong delta since 1996. The Lower Mekong Archaeological Project blends field research with training, and examines state formation and landscape evolution in the first millennium CE. She has joined the Greater Angkor Project for the 2010-2015 research program.
Oc Eo (Khmer, Keo river), believed by some as the seaport of the Funan (2nd-7th century); but Oc Eo was not situated directly at the coast of the bay of Rach Gia province, there was at no time a port by which the Chinese envoys could enter the Funan polity. Additionally, no records mentioning a port at Rach Gia during or after Funan. But Peam Meas (from which "Meithor" derives) is known as a khmer port. Peam means "mouth" of a river or a lake, it also means "(water) port". (Thai, "Pa(k)" came from Khmer "Peam", Pac-nam mouth of the river) Peam Ro, for instance, in Prey Veng, was an ancient port of Ba Phnom. Peam Meas might have been the Funan's seaport the Chinese envoys mentioned. From Peam Meas, the Chinese envoys could (via the Mekong) enter the Ba Phnom's port of Peam Ro.
Now, the distance of 500 li or 200 km from the sea to the capital of Funan, as estimated by the Chinese envoys recorded in 6th century cannot be seen from Oc Eo site. And it could not have been Angkor Borei, Takeo, as Angkor Borei was/is only about 85 km from O Keo/Oc Eo, and shorter in distance from Peam Meas/Meithor. Ba Phnom, Prey Veng, loosely fits the distance description by the Chinese envoys. Archaeological finds/riches at Prohear village, and Bit Meas, in Prey Veng, supports the description that Prey Veng's Ba Phnom might have been the capital of Funan, the Rich South.
Professor Miriam Starks will convince us that it's the Angkor Borei site was the Funan's capital. This will be interesting.
See you tonight at the University of Sydney, people.
Regards
Touch Bora
---------------------------------------------
The lecture is free just turn up. Thank you for RSVPing.
Cheers,
Martin
___________________________________
Martin P. King PhD
Angkor Research Program
Digital Innovation Unit for the Humanities and Social Sciences
Room 314 Madsen Building F09
University of Sydney
NSW 2006
Australia
Phone: +61-2-9351-7667
Fax: +61-2-9351-3644
E-mail: martin.king@sydney.edu.au
http://sydney.edu.au/angkor/
http://sydney.edu.au/arts/digitalinnovation/
S.T. Lee Annual Lecture in Asian Art and Archaeology 2010
The Lee Annual Lecture in Asian Art and Archaeology will be held in the Refectory of the Main Quadrangle of the University of Sydney from 6pm Wednesday 11th August 2010. This years lecture will be given by Professor Miriam Stark, Archaeologist, University of Hawai’i-Manoa, United States of America.
The Mekong Delta Before Angkor: origins, landscapes and emergent complexity
The earliest states in mainland Southeast Asia emerged between 500 BCE and 500 CE, a period known as the Axial Age. In the West, this time encompassed Hellenistic Greece, the rise of the Roman Empire, and the birth of Christianity. Viewed from the East, the period included imperial expansion by the Han dynasty, the rise of the earliest Korean and Japanese kingdoms, the spread of Buddhism across the Asian continent, and rise of competing empires during the golden age of South Asia. Southeast Asians also embraced this Axial Age, although few historians or archaeologists have studied the period until recently. During this time Southeast Asians established a South China Sea maritime trade network and built large settlements along the region’s coasts and inland deltas. They adopted writing systems and religious ideology from South Asia, and created Indic-tinged templates for statecraft whose signatures shaped the emergence and operation of Southeast Asias classical states like Angkor, Sukothai, and Pagan nearly a thousand years later.
Professor Miriam Stark has worked in collaboration with CambodiaR17;s Ministry of Culture and Fine Arts since 1996 on the archaeology of the Mekong Delta. This region was politically central during the Axial Age, and work by her Lower Mekong Archaeological Project began with research at the archaeological site of Angkor Borei (Takeo province). Most scholars consider that this 300 ha walled site was a Funan capital that the Chinese annals described during the early to mid-first millennium CE. The region remained prominent in the following pre-Angkorian period, and research described in this lecture examines archaeological research by the Lower Mekong Archaeological Project on landscapes and emergent complexity.
Date: Wednesday 11th August 2010
Time: 6 - 8pm
Location: Refectory of the Main Quadrangle of the University of Sydney (http://www2.arts.usyd.edu.au/ArtsNetwork/docs/main_quad_instr.pdf)
RSVP: Monday 9th August 2010 (Martin King - 9351-7667 or martin.king@sydney.edu.au)
Miriam Stark was awarded a PhD from the University of Arizona in 1993, and has worked in Southeast Asian archaeology since 1987. With extensive field experience in North America (particularly the North American Southwest), she studied tribal potters in the northern Philippines for her doctoral research. She worked with the Thailand Archaeometallurgical project in central Thailand in the early 1990s, and after accepting a position at the University of Hawaii-Manoa -- began her archaeological studies in Cambodia. Through the Lower Mekong Archaeological Project and in collaboration with CambodiaR17;s Ministry of Culture and Fine Arts, Miriam has worked in the Mekong delta since 1996. The Lower Mekong Archaeological Project blends field research with training, and examines state formation and landscape evolution in the first millennium CE. She has joined the Greater Angkor Project for the 2010-2015 research program.
No comments:
Post a Comment